1 (edited by Ranger1964 2008-01-18 15:32:49)

Topic: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Some background before we get started.  I'm 43 and have been playing a few months and am progressing nicely and I’m happy with my progress.  I know CAGED Em,Am,  G7, E7, etc.  I’ve finally gotten the F but need to work on speed with it next.  I play 40-60 min EVERY DAY.  I am playing lots of songs (playing them well if I do say so myself) and am having a BLAST.  I’m a fairly good singer and my interest in music has been life long and have planned on playing my entire life but I finally did something about it a few months ago when I jumped in and bought a guitar. 

I play both types of music Country and Western.  Ok j/k but I do play mostly country but I’m the words biggest Bruce Springsteen fan so it’s really that I like to play ballads of country, rock, folk etc.

I started with a Fender Squire, gave t to my son bought a Mexican Fat Strat but when my interest in music began to clarify I realized I needed an acoustic guitar.  My wifey plays, but I hate her Ovation so I went out and bought an Alvarez PD80SC and I really like it but……..now things are a little more clear to me or maybe less clear?

I paid about $550 for my Alvarez but let’s say for simplicity sake that there is a $600, $1,200, and $2,400 price point.  So my question is this for experienced players, know-it-alls, heck anybody with an opinion.  Of course money matters but I’m trying to decide if I should maybe go up to one of the other price points.  I admit that I’m brand conscious so let’s get that out there.  At the $1,200 price point there are some beautiful: Martin’s, Taylor’s, and Takamine’s.  At $2,400 there are all of the above plus some wonderful Gibson’s.  If we presume that this is a life long hobby of mine, it is just gnawing at me that maybe I should step up a bit and never worry about my equipment again.  So what am I really getting different at each price point?  I will probably never perform but maybe at church so I want an acoustic/electric.  I don’t believe that only professional musicians are entitled to superior sounding music.  Yes they may be being paid for it, but hell if a $1,200 or $2,400 guitar sounds better, well hell, I’m my own audience so who deserves to experience it more than me?!  But what will the difference be at each of those ranges?

I was in a local shop the other day and the salesman was showing me a Martin and a Gibson Songwriter Deluxe (the one that started all of this questioning), they sounded MUCH different from each other but is the listening or playing experience better?  I know it’s probably not twice as good ($1,200) or 4 times as good ($2,400) but is it better? I’m certain that if “we" (I need your help) decide on a price point of either the $1,200 or $2,400 I can find the one I like (but I still want specific suggestions), but right now I need to know if I should A) not bother, B) find a nice $1,200 guitar (I’m liking what I’m reading about the Takamine’s) or is it worth it to C) go up to the $2,400 range?

Sorry for how long this is, but hey what’s more fun to talk about than guitars?

Thanks.

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Ranger, what a great post.  I started when I was 40 (six years ago), and like you play mostly in our contemporary worship band at church.  I started a band with some of my friends who like a bit more rock in their worship, and we're gigging a little bit now--you are at the begining of a great journey my friend!
There are people a LOT more knowledgable than me on the board, but it seems to me after a certain price, a lot of the price has to to with ornamentation...fancy inlays and the like.  Once you get the best grade wood, etc., what else can you do?  Personally, I'm not a Takamine fan--I know they make some great guitars, but they make some garbage too which clouds my opinion of their whole line (not fair, but what the heck).  I am a HUGE fan of Laravee guitars, hand made up in canada.  Entry point is $900ish, can get over $2,500 easy.  There's a koa wood Taylor that I've been playing that I love too--I think that thing is $2,100 ish.
Whatever I got, I'd grab a Fishman Loudbox acoustic amp to go with it--love those things!

3 (edited by cytania 2008-01-18 15:45:07)

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Hi Ranger, every guitar you own teaches you something. It's not guarranteed that an expensive instrument will sound good and there are some great sounding mid-range guitars out there.

First off let's discount any instrument that is expensive because of cosmetics. Inlays and veneers are nice but icing on the cake.

Now we get down to sound. As you buy guitars you may be reacting to your previous main player. So say your last guitar was a bit over bright the next purchase might be woody and boxy. It's not just overcompensation but your ear and musical taste evolving.

There's also a big difference between a guitar you might use for recording or playing in your home and the kind of instrument you could gig or even get out at the family barbecue. Expensive instruments can remain in the case because you don't dare scratch them!

Martin and Taylor are big names and you do pay a premium. Checkout Freshman, BlueRidge and Tanglewood's  mid to upper mid offerings for real tone value. Having said this a Martin or Taylor will always retain some resale/part exchage value when less well regarded names may not be accepted by stores, depends if you'll be trading in ever.

Beware guitar shop salesmen playing a guitar at you. Those guys are often way talented players and can make any instrument sound good straight out the box. My local store guy demonstrated a Yamaha jazz box to me, he could make it sing, I could hardly raise any volume from it. Make sure you play the guitar yourself and don't tell yourself 'it must be my ears I'll buy it anyway'. I played some astonishingly expensive Freshman guitars in a downtown store where the salesman read snippets from reviews that praised them to the sky, but to me they sounded overly trebley. Maybe my ears and fingers aren't ready for them yet...

'The sound of the city seems to disappear'

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

cytania wrote:

Hi Ranger, every guitar you own teaches you something. It's not guarranteed that an expensive instrument will sound good and there are some great sounding mid-range guitars out there.

First off let's discount any instrument that is expensive because of cosmetics. Inlays and veneers are nice but icing on the cake.

Now we get down to sound. As you buy guitars you may be reacting to your previous main player. So say your last guitar was a bit over bright the next purchase might be woody and boxy. It's not just overcompensation but your ear and musical taste evolving.

There's also a big difference between a guitar you might use for recording or playing in your home and the kind of instrument you could gig or even get out at the family barbecue. Expensive instruments can remain in the case because you don't dare scratch them!

Martin and Taylor are big names and you do pay a premium. Checkout Freshman, BlueRidge and Tanglewood's  mid to upper mid offerings for real tone value. Having said this a Martin or Taylor will always retain some resale/part exchage value when less well regarded names may not be accepted by stores, depends if you'll be trading in ever.

Beware guitar shop salesmen playing a guitar at you. Those guys are often way talented players and can make any instrument sound good straight out the box. My local store guy demonstrated a Yamaha jazz box to me, he could make it sing, I could hardly raise any volume from it. Make sure you play the guitar yourself and don't tell yourself 'it must be my ears I'll buy it anyway'. I played some astonishingly expensive Freshman guitars in a downtown store where the salesman read snippets from reviews that praised them to the sky, but to me they sounded overly trebley. Maybe my ears and fingers aren't ready for them yet...

Thank you.  I'm glad you pointed out that you might go form one guitar to another just because it sounds different.  When the salesman played the Martin "woody" is exactly how I would describe it and the Gibson sounded a little brighter to me (more like my Alvarez) so I started thinking "well a Martin is the way to go, listen to that tone" but as you point out it was DIFFERENT but that doesn't make it better.  I do trust the salesmen BUT I will decide which guitar I like based on how it feels and plays.  In fact, when I walked in the store, I had done a lot of research and was ready to buy a Yamaha at about $500.  The slaesman let me try it and I asked him to show me anything else that I may want to consider.  That's when he gave me Alvarez.  At that point I could only do a few chords and could barely change BUT I knew immediately that I like the Alvarez over the Yamaha.  It sounds as if you are saying that there are some GREAT guitars in the mid price range and beyond that the difference may be cosmetics and brand name recogniton?  That is also something that interested me in the Taylors, Martins and Takamines.  They have some beautiful guitars in the mide price point.  I noticed you didn't mention Gibsons.  Is that because they only start at the upper price point?  I've noticed that the vast majority of country musicians are playing Gibsons.  That's why I'm wondering "are they playing them because they are the best" or is Gibson sponsoring them so players like me will buy them just becasue of their stable of artists?  One time I owned a hunting rifle that was so beautiful that I was afraid to use it.  In fact the only time I used I scratched it taking it out of my truck!  I almost barfed!  I used it once and got rid of it!  I swore I would NEVER own a gun again that I was afraid to use.  I guess the same holds true with a guitar.  Most likely the only place my guitar will ever go is my bed room, living room, my front porch, and maybe to church.  Momma may kill me if I buy a new guitar but definitely will kill me if I say I want 2 because I'm afraid to play my new one, so I guess I need to keep that in mind also.

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Yes indeed, all these artists, who can afford 50 very, very expensive guitars, well they receive an own model, or guitars for free, endorsement.
I own 12 acoustics, Martins and Gibsons, so I am used to their sound and because I am so spoiled it is more difficult to buy a guitar like an Epiphone EJ-200 similar to a Gibson SJ-200 (which I have)
A problem, often neglected is buying a 2000$ Gibson and play it, the price will not drop. If you want a high priced guitar I am 100% convinced that you would love the sound. I noticed that even the Big BRANDS, do have cheaper models, like Martin D-1.
suggestion: listen to different brands on youtube, and go to a store and try the big 3: Gibson, Martin, Taylor, followed by other brands as Blueridge, Takamine, Epiphone.

[color=blue]- GITAARDOCPHIL SAIS: TO CONQUER DEAD, YOU HAVE TO DIE[/color]   AND [color=blue] we are born to die[/color]
- MY GUITAR PLAYS EVERY STYLE = BLUES, ROCK, METAL, so I NEED TO LEARN HOW TO PLAY IT.
[color=blue]Civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock.[/color]

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

gitaardocphil wrote:

Yes indeed, all these artists, who can afford 50 very, very expensive guitars, well they receive an own model, or guitars for free, endorsement.
I own 12 acoustics, Martins and Gibsons, so I am used to their sound and because I am so spoiled it is more difficult to buy a guitar like an Epiphone EJ-200 similar to a Gibson SJ-200 (which I have)
A problem, often neglected is buying a 2000$ Gibson and play it a few months to put it back in the case, to start again years later. If you want a high priced guitar I am 100% convinced that you would love the sound. I noticed that even the Big BRANDS, do have cheaper models, like Martin D-1.
suggestion: listen to different brands on youtube, and go to a store and try the big 3: Gibson, Martin, Taylor, followed by other brands as Blueridge, Takamine, Epiphone.

Ok, but let me ask you this (this is the crux of my post) you say that you own 12 acoustics Martins and Gibsons.  Why?  Unless you are fabulously wealthy or secretely a rock/country musician, you have chosen to spend your hard earned on money on premium guitars. So why Gibson and Martins.  What is it about the 2 brands that has made you decide that you are willing to go to that upper price point, not once or twice but 12 times.  Is the sound? the feel? does it relate to recording music?  Is it that they are just recognized as the best (as the man said "I am easily satisfied with the very best" I think it was Churchill).  That is what I'm trying to drill down to.  What do I get when I go up to the $1,200 range (better woods, probably solid sides and back anything else?) what does that translate into in terms of my playing and listening experience? What do I get when I go to $2,400 I know some have said ornamentation and I can see that in some of the Gibsons but heck, Martins are pretty basic even at the high end.

Sorry to ask so many questions but what I'm trying to do is find out from real players why they have chosen to (beyond just financial constraints) to pick a certain price point.  I'm an avid golfer and 2 times I went to Palm Springs,CA for a week courtesy of Golf Magazine and was a club tester for them so I'm familiar with reviews and I'm kind of looking for a breakdown of what players think matters and what doesn't.

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Great post! I'm about ten years older than you...probably lots more experience playing...and probably not half as good a player, and have never been a professional. I'm certainly not a Know It All so I guess I fall in the "Anybody with and Opinion Category...lol! Cutting to the chase, I would shop around and by the most Martin that I could with my $2400.00. Why? Because I like Martin guitars and have a long history with them. Are they better? No, not really...it's simply what I like. You mentioned C&W music...long Martin history with C&W artists! Also the Martin is one that should hold or increase in value (Gibson/Taylor too!) and some day you can hand it down to your son...    Some of the Import guitars like Alvarez, Ibanez, and Takamine (others too, can't list all!) are outstanding guitars and are a really great value for the money...but they are imports and most will not have the collectability and desirability of high end American Instruments. Anyway...just some opinion from someone who loves to play....

Middleaged Redneck sorta guy who refuses to grow up...passion for music, especially Southern Rock but like bout everything cept Gangsta/Hip Hop. Collect guitars, mandolins, and love to ride Harleys.

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

I have a Jumbo Takamine acoustic/electric that I paid $650.00 for about a year ago. The other night a group of us were playing when one of the guy's asked ne if he could play my guitar. We swaped for a while, him with my Takamine and me with his MARTIN. Later that night when we were kinda taking a break he questioned me about how good my guitar sounded and how he wished he could get the same sound outta his MARTIN. As we were discussing the qualities of both guitars we got into what kinda amp we were using. He was using a 90 watt PEAVEY electric guitar amp and mine was a ROLAND AC-60 acoustic amp. When we went back to playing he plugged into my amp and the difference in sound quality was amazing. What we finally figured out was the acoustic amp was making the difference. BUT his last comment to me was that he had over $2000.00 invested in his MARTIN and if he had known how good the Takamime sounded he would have saved himself a lotta $$$$$$$. I guess the basis of this story is that big dollars spent does not necessarly mean you done got better quality. Always buy the best product you can afford but do your homework first. Aslo, check out what amp works best with the electric / asoustic guitar you buy. There are several makes and models out there, try them as well. No need to amp up a high dollar guitar to a cardboard box and expect to put a smile on your face.

Nela

9 (edited by Ranger1964 2008-01-18 22:06:13)

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

OMG.  I can't believe I'm actually thinking his but ... here goes. I really like my Alvarez and if I upgrade to an Alvarez-Yari hand made I can get one that looks almost exactly like my current one and wifey would be none the wiser.  Mind you, I have the money squirrelled away (birthday, CHristmas gifts etc) but after 22 years of marriage to the greatest girl in the world, sometimes you know which battles to fight.  Of course maybe I'll try the Yari and not notice any difference.  The shop I go to carries on the high end Yari, Gibson and Martin.  I will need to travel to find some Takamines or Taylors to try.

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Great posts here. It all comes down to this; Don't buy the hype, buy what feels and sounds right. Too many times people pay way too much money for the writing that's on the headstock of a guitar. Go to music stores and play every guitar in the dang store. Use the same amp to ensure a consistent sound source. Many times when I'm playing out people will come up to the front of the stage, squinty-eyed, looking at the headstock of my guitar. If I know for sure that I'll not be trading a guitar  in the future, I'll black-out or tape the logo on the headstock. It's all about sound and feel, not heritage and prestige. My personal rule of thumb, so to speak, it once a year I'll allow myself my average weeks pay, from playing music, to purchase a guitar. Only once have I spent the full amount. I can't stress this point enough, it's all about comfort and feel for the specific individual, Hands on, ears open, preconceived notions left at the door, select what best suits you and you alone.

Give everything but up.

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

SouthPaw has it right. If you can afford to drop $2500 on a guitar, you can afford to not drop it, too. Go play a bunch of guitars under that point, and buy the one that you like the most, irrespective of price.

I've got a super cheap Yamaha (made by Yamaha) that cost like $100.  It's a fantastic guitar.  I've also played $4500 San Joses that made me weep with desire.  But not that much desire.

Someday we'll win this thing...

[url=http://www.aclosesecond.com]www.aclosesecond.com[/url]

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

I've "decided" (many of my decisions are temporary, lol) that I just can't justify a $2,400 guitar now.  Dads of 3 teens sometimes need to comprimise and for a new player that should be PLENTY of guitar.  Who knows, get the kids through school and maybe buy a second acoustic to add to the one I'm about to get.  So now my quest is the "BEST" guitar for less than $1,500-ish.  I know that there are some Martins, Takamines, Yaris, and Taylors in that range but it eliminates Gibsons.  I have my eye on a Taylor 310ce.  I'm making a trip to Lousville in 2 weeks and there are a few biggger music stores there so I hope to get to sample a few of each mfg.  One thing I know, I do like a little brighter sound, so that may lead towards or away from one mfg or another.  Of course my Alvarez was a surprise to me when I bought it so I'm not necessarily eliminating any mfg. but I would aleast like to have heard of it, KWIM?

BTW-the $1,500 max doesn't mean that I will go that high, it just means that I will eliminate anything more than that from the running.

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Ranger 1964,

Paw has hit it on the head, I just got back from a music store and played a Gibson, Breedlove & Taylor.  The Gibson & Taylor were both great sounding guitars.  Both actions played well and If I had the cash I would have walked away with the Gibson. With that said as Southpaw said play them all and what feels and sounds good to you is what matters. I have always said that a million dollar guitar won't make you sound like a million if you can't play it.

Good luck,

Bootlegger.

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

If you are looking for an electric / acoustic do not overlook the amp you need for your high $$$$ guitar. You can spend all the $$$$$ you want on a guitar then play it thru a "POS" amp and all you have is a low quality sound. Many quality amps out there for the chosing but there are a equal amount of low end amps, as well. Look for a acoustic amp with chorus, I think you will be happy. No need to buy the "JACK" if you don't have the "DANIEL'S" to go with it.

Nela

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

I think that it comes down to what makes us happy as guitarists.
An acoustic guitar is a wooden box with a soundhole - as long as it sounds alright you can get bye until the funds arrive.As long as the the action is good,and there's not too many other big holes in the thing;it's what you do with the thing that makes it count.It's how you play it!Then you can have the taylors and Gibson etc for the look - but far better musicians play with alot less.I tend too think that the early blues players survived on alot less....hell i've seen guitars made from oil cans.....

"It's all about the Calluses, once you got them, you can't get rid of em!"

16

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

WOW looking at the replies here i see i am not the only one that has picked up the guitar around the 40 mark. I have just started learning about 18 months ago with my kids.
I too learnt that there is ahuge difference in guitars. Basically i jus started on a very cheap guitar (Ashton) and when my family wanted to buy me a neat xmas gift we went to our favorite music store. The lesson i learnt was to first ignore the price tags and the brands. Wander through the shop and pick up every guitar that catches your eye and sit down and play them.
The sounds differs drastically from one to the other, gradually you will end up with a few guitars that you like, that is when you look at the price tags and see what fits into your budget. The important thing is the "what you like" for sound.
Dont forget also that a simple change of strings to a good quality set can also make a huge difference to the sound of the guitar.

I actually found that some of the $1,000 plus guitars actually sounded worse (to me) than my $90 cheapy. I ended up settling on a fender for $400. I put a set of high end classical nylon strings on it and it has the perfect sound for me.

Oh and if you are buying an electric / accoustic fdont forget to ask them to plug it in at the shop and this will give you nad idea of the sound through the pickups as this can make a big difference also.

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

C3 wrote:

WOW looking at the replies here i see i am not the only one that has picked up the guitar around the 40 mark. I have just started learning about 18 months ago with my kids.
I too learnt that there is ahuge difference in guitars. Basically i jus started on a very cheap guitar (Ashton) and when my family wanted to buy me a neat xmas gift we went to our favorite music store. The lesson i learnt was to first ignore the price tags and the brands. Wander through the shop and pick up every guitar that catches your eye and sit down and play them.
The sounds differs drastically from one to the other, gradually you will end up with a few guitars that you like, that is when you look at the price tags and see what fits into your budget. The important thing is the "what you like" for sound.
Dont forget also that a simple change of strings to a good quality set can also make a huge difference to the sound of the guitar.

I actually found that some of the $1,000 plus guitars actually sounded worse (to me) than my $90 cheapy. I ended up settling on a fender for $400. I put a set of high end classical nylon strings on it and it has the perfect sound for me.

Oh and if you are buying an electric / accoustic fdont forget to ask them to plug it in at the shop and this will give you nad idea of the sound through the pickups as this can make a big difference also.

Interesting but what I didn't say in my original post was that my youngest got interested in guitar and THAT was what finally pushed me to finally take up guitar.  I don't know, I kind of felt "dorky" wanting to start guitar at 30, then 35, then 40, and finally I did it, but really only because my son did it.  I guess the lesson is that if I hadn't started now, I may never have.  You know once we get to be adults and parents sometimes it's hard to "bare our souls" and try something completely new.  But, I try to teach my kids that life is about learning and I try to give them examples of that.  I got my MBA at 38, learned to mat and frame photos about the same time and took up guitar at 43.  The one thing I try to tell people is that if you are interested in playing you can do it by just learning CAGED and in a month or so be able to play MANY songs.  So it's never too late to start.

Maybe we should start a "Late Starters" thread?

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Ranger1964 wrote:
C3 wrote:

WOW looking at the replies here i see i am not the only one that has picked up the guitar around the 40 mark. I have just started learning about 18 months ago with my kids.
I too learnt that there is ahuge difference in guitars. Basically i jus started on a very cheap guitar (Ashton) and when my family wanted to buy me a neat xmas gift we went to our favorite music store. The lesson i learnt was to first ignore the price tags and the brands. Wander through the shop and pick up every guitar that catches your eye and sit down and play them.
The sounds differs drastically from one to the other, gradually you will end up with a few guitars that you like, that is when you look at the price tags and see what fits into your budget. The important thing is the "what you like" for sound.
Dont forget also that a simple change of strings to a good quality set can also make a huge difference to the sound of the guitar.

I actually found that some of the $1,000 plus guitars actually sounded worse (to me) than my $90 cheapy. I ended up settling on a fender for $400. I put a set of high end classical nylon strings on it and it has the perfect sound for me.

Oh and if you are buying an electric / accoustic fdont forget to ask them to plug it in at the shop and this will give you nad idea of the sound through the pickups as this can make a big difference also.

Interesting but what I didn't say in my original post was that my youngest got interested in guitar and THAT was what finally pushed me to finally take up guitar.  I don't know, I kind of felt "dorky" wanting to start guitar at 30, then 35, then 40, and finally I did it, but really only because my son did it.  I guess the lesson is that if I hadn't started now, I may never have.  You know once we get to be adults and parents sometimes it's hard to "bare our souls" and try something completely new.  But, I try to teach my kids that life is about learning and I try to give them examples of that.  I got my MBA at 38, learned to mat and frame photos about the same time took up home improvement/carpentry at 39 and took up guitar at 43.  The one thing I try to tell people is that if you are interested in playing you can do it by just learning CAGED and in a month or so be able to play MANY songs.  So it's never too late to start.

Maybe we should start a "Late Starters" thread?

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

TAKAMINES!!! big_smile
  Gotta say I love mine

All You Need is Love smile

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

Tomorrow I'm off to try Martin's, Taylor's, Yari, and Gibson's at 2 music stores about an hour from here.  I've decided to pick the guitar I like without regard to the electronics as I may NEVER plug it in.  (If I fall for an accoustic/electric great).  If I ever need to plug one in I can always use my wifey's Ovation (which needs a serious neck adjustment.  The action is WAY too high)

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

New Guitar Search Update:

Yesterday was the day.  I traveled about an hour to some guitar stores and had the opportunity to test a bunch of guitars.  Let me start by saying that my hour drive took an hour and half as I drove through lake effect snow and at times near white out conditions!  But, I have an SUV and, you’ve gotta have priorities!

I of course will qualify my opinions with the fact that I know I’m a new guitar player but I do have 2 functioning ears, have loved music my entire life and now in hindsight, realize that I had a clear mental impression of what I want MY guitar to sound like. 

I got to the first shop (the one where I purchased my Alvarez and Fat Strat) and sat down with the salesman we talked for a while as he told me how much he thought I would like a Martin DC16RGTE Aura.  I finally asked “well do you have one I can try?† and he said……No.  Talk about lunch bag let down!  So I ended up trying a bunch of other Martins.  I started with the HD35, then the HD28, and then a D18.  I probably should have gone in reverse order because I started at the top and worked my way down.  The HD35 is clearly out of my price range but it had a booming low end but still had some punch at the higher end.  The D18 also had the distinctive Martin low end but the booming lows seemed to overwhelm the high end.  All I could hear was that booming bass.  The HD 28 seemed somewhere in the middle to me.  I will say that all of the guitars had old strings and I finally pulled my digital tuner out and put the D18 in tune.  It was at least one note low on every string!  Is that something that they would have done on purpose to accentuate Martin’s reputation for strong booming low end?  I mean if a dumb-ass like me can notice how out of tune it is, how could accomplished players not notice?  I’ve got to tell you, that I went in prejudiced toward the Martins, but that booming bass just isn’t what I had in my mind.  I tried some various Gibsons.  The bottom line on the Gibsons, is that to me while they were a little more balanced, the majority of them had no “life† or no richness to the tone.  The only one I liked was the Song Writer Deluxe.  It was a beautiful guitar and the most lively of the bunch but certainly did not blow me away.  Finally, I tried the YariDY84C.  That guitar looks a lot like mine, sounds a little richer or fuller at both ends and costs about $1,000 more!  There was no way there was more than a $200 difference to my ear.

I left feeling a little depressed.  They are going to get me a DC16RGTE to try, but I just had a funny feeling in the pit of my stomach.  I’m thinking of spending A LOT of money and just was,…… hmm what’s the word, …..“under -whelmed†.  I really thought I would leave that store having made a decision but, I pointed my car DEEPER into the lake effect snows and headed to the shop that sells Taylors.  We went into their temperature and humidity controlled room and the owner and I talked for a few minutes and he got me a 310 and a GA3 (I think).  Well the first strum just blew me away!  It was like a 6 string explosion!  What I mean by that, is that I heard all 6 strings explode with sound.  It was like a person strumming a harp.  Every note was in perfect pitch and tone with the prior and subsequent.  This is the sound I had imagined in my mind!!  To directly compare, the Martin had a much more booming low end but when I played chords the low end was all I heard.  It’s possible that a far more experienced player can take one of those guitars and use the low end to accentuate without overwhelming the high end, but my playing ability is not there.  The Gibson, well that was more balanced in its sound but it was like comparing a firecracker to an M-80.  It’s like a pop vs. a BOOM. The GA3 had a more mellow tone, but the 310 really boomed at the low end and rang out at the higher end.  I was in love with the Taylor sound, I knew that instantly.  Now, the matter of aesthetics; I know it shouldn’t matter but I know myself enough to know that it does.  If we acknowledge that part of the sensory appreciation of an instrument is sound and feel, I have to admit that the visual component is also a factor me.  I just can’t get past those satin sides and back.  To me it looks like the luthier got tired and stained the back and sides but forgot to apply the varnish.  So I began looking at the guitars on the wall and after talking to the shop owner, he brought me a special deal.  There is an 810 that somebody put 2 nicks on the back.  Bottom line is that he is taking over $600 off of the Musician’s Friend price.  The 810 was just more of the 310 sound that I loved.  If the GA3 was skim-milk, the 310 was whole milk, and the 810 is heavy cream.  Rich and smooth!

I think I’m going to call the shop owner and make an offer on the 810.  It’s more than I want to spend but if I don’t buy it, I’m afraid that I will regret it the rest of my life.  If I buy a second high end guitar, I may very well go for that distinctive Martin sound, but if I’m going to have one, the Taylor is for me!

Now I just have to sell a 2 month old Alvarez and a 3 month old Fat Strat.

Yee Haw

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

I have a Martin GTE ... the OM size and absolutely love it. It does not have near the acoustic volume of the others, D-18, Taylor, Hd, etc., but plugged in it sounds great and is well balanced. It's also a thinner body which contributes to the lower acoustic volume, but also less "boomy" and much easier (for me) to play with a strap while standing...

Middleaged Redneck sorta guy who refuses to grow up...passion for music, especially Southern Rock but like bout everything cept Gangsta/Hip Hop. Collect guitars, mandolins, and love to ride Harleys.

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

You are doing the right thing trying as many guitars as possible. I started playing alot in my forties and I'm now 54. I have several guitars my two favorites are a Yairi WB1SB and HD 28 Martin. I play alot of Neil Young Music and the HD 28 is hard to beat unplugged. My Yairi has the best electronics I have heard and it is hard to beat plugged in but a little wimpy unplugged.

I don't think there is a guitar that will do everything excellent if you play alot of different styles of Music but I don't think you can go wrong with the Taylor, they are very nice.They have a great action and bright tone,also great electronics.

Later Wayne

Later, Wayne P

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

RANGER, All I tied to write is meant as information. Didn't I add other guitars as Epiphone, Takamine?
WHY SO MANY GUITARS, I COULD SAY THAT IT'S MY BUSINESS, BUT I AM NOT A PERSON WHO REACTS SO. I PREFER TO BE HONEST.  ABOUT MY ACOUSTICS:
It started with a junk coming since years to my consult. He needed money. THIS IS SOMETHING MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW. If I write that I helped a lot of people by charging them what they got back from our social security, like 20$ in stead of 30$. Adding all the 10$ I didn't ask, I could buy a house. Why? THIS IS ME. There are people who needed the money a lot more than I did. Some more? I GAVE ( not asking back that money) A LOT. WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU HAVE A HOUSE CALL, AND YOU ENTER AN ICECOLD HOME, LIGHT COMING FROM CANDLES, electricity cut of, AND THEY HAD 5 KIDS, AND NO MONEY TO BUY FOOD? I GAVE 500$. To come again on that Junkie: he gave me his guitar, a MARTIN-HD28 like you bought, and you won't regret it. I invested by giving 8000$ to friends who wanted to take over a music store. Getting back the money = difficult, so we agreed that they paid me back with guitars. Before you know, you have 10 guitars.
WHY MARTINS AND GIBSONS? EVERY MUSIC STORE HAD, HERE IN BELGIUM, 75%OF THEIR STOCK were these guitars. TAYLOR, TAKAMINE unknown.
I ADORE THE SOUND, AND BECAUSE OF THE BRANDS ALL MY GUITARS ARE 2 to 3 TIMES MORE IN VALUE.
WEALTHY:  YES even this question deserves an answer. I took some big financial risks by buying a laser, a device to treat cellulitis with success. I worked 80 hours a week to be called "wealthy". How many hours do most people work?
I AM DISABLED DUE TO A CAR ACCIDENT I STARTED AGAIN BUT I HAD TO STOP, BECAUSE OF TOO SEVERE PHYSICAL PROBLEMS. AND A SECOND YES ABOUT BEING WEALTHY: I WAS AND STILL AM OVERINSURED RESULTING IN HAVING MORE THAN ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY 2 GUITARS IN NASHVILLE IN GRUHN'S STORE.
IT'S BY TAKING RISKS IN MY JOB, THAT I WAS "WEALTHY"AND BY BEING OVERINSURED. HERE THE MUSIC STORES changed a lot, having 60% more different brands, compared to 8 years. I DO WITH MY MONEY WHAT I WANT, and a lot of people told me that I could play on 1 guitar.
ALL MY ACOUSTICS ARE TWICE AS MUCH WORTH NOW.
So: I worked for free (if you go to a doctor here, they give you a receipt, send it to your company, and they pay you back as told. 30$ was the price, I asked 20$, and they got 25$ back. I AM TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE AND NOT ABOUT A BREAD. BEFORE YOU REALISE YOU HAVE MORE AND MORE GUITARS. Why do people collect stamps? is this so different or difficult to understand that I collect and play. You can take a guess: HOW MANY ELECTRIC GUITARS I OWN.
My only intention was to answer and offer my help, seeing that the guitars you mentioned were MARTINS and GIBSONS TOO. To give advise.
PLEASE DON'T JUDGE ME BECAUSE I AM BLESSED TO BUILD A NICE COLLECTION, see it as investment, to end: the value has tripled and I AM UNABLE TO LIVE A NORMAL LIFE, SO PLEASE RESPECT MY HOBBY, MY PASSION itis one of the few things that I can do: playing guitar.

[color=blue]- GITAARDOCPHIL SAIS: TO CONQUER DEAD, YOU HAVE TO DIE[/color]   AND [color=blue] we are born to die[/color]
- MY GUITAR PLAYS EVERY STYLE = BLUES, ROCK, METAL, so I NEED TO LEARN HOW TO PLAY IT.
[color=blue]Civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock.[/color]

25 (edited by Ranger1964 2008-01-30 19:24:53)

Re: $600, $1,200, or $2,400 Acoustic?? Need Help!

gitaardocphil wrote:

RANGER, All I tied to write is meant as information. Didn't I add other guitars as Epiphone, Takamine?
WHY SO MANY GUITARS, I COULD SAY THAT IT'S MY BUSINESS, BUT I AM NOT A PERSON WHO REACTS SO. I PREFER TO BE HONEST.  ABOUT MY ACOUSTICS:
It started with a junk coming since years to my consult. He needed money. THIS IS SOMETHING MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW. If I write that I helped a lot of people by charging them what they got back from our social security, like 20$ in stead of 30$. Adding all the 10$ I didn't ask, I could buy a house. Why? THIS IS ME. There are people who needed the money a lot more than I did. Some more? I GAVE ( not asking back that money) A LOT. WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU HAVE A HOUSE CALL, AND YOU ENTER AN ICECOLD HOME, LIGHT COMING FROM CANDLES, electricity cut of, AND THEY HAD 5 KIDS, AND NO MONEY TO BUY FOOD? I GAVE 500$. To come again on that Junkie: he gave me his guitar, a MARTIN-HD28 like you bought, and you won't regret it. I invested by giving 8000$ to friends who wanted to take over a music store. Getting back the money = difficult, so we agreed that they paid me back with guitars. Before you know, you have 10 guitars.
WHY MARTINS AND GIBSONS? EVERY MUSIC STORE HAD, HERE IN BELGIUM, 75%OF THEIR STOCK were these guitars. TAYLOR, TAKAMINE unknown.
I ADORE THE SOUND, AND BECAUSE OF THE BRANDS ALL MY GUITARS ARE 2 to 3 TIMES MORE IN VALUE.
WEALTHY:  YES even this question deserves an answer. I took some big financial risks by buying a laser, a device to treat cellulitis with success. I worked 80 hours a week to be called "wealthy". How many hours do most people work?
I AM DISABLED DUE TO A CAR ACCIDENT I STARTED AGAIN BUT I HAD TO STOP, BECAUSE OF TOO SEVERE PHYSICAL PROBLEMS. AND A SECOND YES ABOUT BEING WEALTHY: I WAS AND STILL AM OVERINSURED RESULTING IN HAVING MORE THAN ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY 2 GUITARS IN NASHVILLE IN GRUHN'S STORE.
IT'S BY TAKING RISKS IN MY JOB, THAT I WAS "WEALTHY"AND BY BEING OVERINSURED. HERE THE MUSIC STORES changed a lot, having 60% more different brands, compared to 8 years. I DO WITH MY MONEY WHAT I WANT, and a lot of people told me that I could play on 1 guitar.
ALL MY ACOUSTICS ARE TWICE AS MUCH WORTH NOW.
So: I worked for free (if you go to a doctor here, they give you a receipt, send it to your company, and they pay you back as told. 30$ was the price, I asked 20$, and they got 25$ back. I AM TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE AND NOT ABOUT A BREAD. BEFORE YOU REALISE YOU HAVE MORE AND MORE GUITARS. Why do people collect stamps? is this so different or difficult to understand that I collect and play. You can take a guess: HOW MANY ELECTRIC GUITARS I OWN.
My only intention was to answer and offer my help, seeing that the guitars you mentioned were MARTINS and GIBSONS TOO. To give advise.
PLEASE DON'T JUDGE ME BECAUSE I AM BLESSED TO BUILD A NICE COLLECTION, see it as investment, to end: the value has tripled and I AM UNABLE TO LIVE A NORMAL LIFE, SO PLEASE RESPECT MY HOBBY, MY PASSION itis one of the few things that I can do: playing guitar.

My friend, I was, and am in way judging you!  I am in awe of your fabulous collection.  I think much of my intent was lost in the process of typing my thoughts and in language issues.  I am a person who seeks knowledge and likes to learn and likes to make educated decisions.  As such, I seek out information beyond reading reviews.  I like even more to speak to the "experts".  But the experts I like to talk to are average people who own the instruments and not salesmen in a store.  So my comment regarding being independently wealthy was made in a joking manner.  You see I frequent a Martin Guitar Forum where there are more than a few guys with 12 Martins.  A joking comment such as "Unless you are fabulously wealthy or secretely a rock/country musician" is usually met with a response such as "oh not wealthy, in fact my wife is going to kill me if I buy another guitar, but I fell in love with Martin's years ago and have been collecting them ever since" or on the off chance that a person might be wealthy you may get "well, a boy must have his toys, and most of my toys have appreciated in value".  Perhaps, as I said, this American sense of kidding gets lost in translation when words are often taken at their literal meaning.

My quest to buy a good guitar can be summed up in one word, “Why".  Why does a person choose a Martin?  Why does a person choose a Gibson?  Why does a person choose a Taylor?  If I’m going to spend a lot of my money on a high end guitar, what should I be looking for?  I was asking for advice.  Is it craftsmanship, is it looks, feel, action?  Is it the booming low end?  Is it a balanced and bright sound?  As I said, I’m relatively new to guitar, is one guitar better for a beginner?  I like country music and ballads.  Does one guitar suit that style of music better?  I will not be performing and will only be playing for myself in my house.  Is one style better for that? 

Please go back and re-read my post.  Imagine that I’m a newspaper reporter and that I’m interviewing you.  I’m doing a story on WHY people buy high end guitars.  If you do that, I think you will see that I wanted your advice.  Please pay attention to how many times that I ask “what do I get?"  That is a person asking for advice, not making judgments.

Yee Haw