Les Paul or SG? (Page 1 of 2)

If it were a Gibson LP classic in tobacco sunburst I would pick it, other wise go for the SG. You did not mention if they were Gibson's or Epiphones.

Bootlegger.

Les pauls are awsome ever herd of something like sweet home alabama thats proof right there

I never heard a difference in guitars until I got my Silverburst LP.
I tried multiple types of guitars in guitar shops and never could tell a difference until I found mine.

I would go with the SG type if you don't want a guitar that is too heavy. My LP weighs about 13 pounds but for me it's worth it. Most people can only play with it for about 5 minutes before they're complaining about their back or leg or something.

Most SG guitars are a LOT lighter from what I've experienced in guitar shops.

Dm

Both are Epiphones.  The SG looks cooler but I like the colors of the LP better.  I'm leaning toward a Vintage G-400 SG, though.  I read the SG is lighter.  That's a plus.  Does anyone else have any opinions?  What's the biggest difference between these two and a Strat or Tele? Thanks

You can get clean and distorted licks outta a Les Paul.  I love mine and find it one of the most versitile guitars on the planet.  I can crank out the Heavy Metal, The Hard Rock, Uh....the "in between stuff" whatever that is and even the Blues.  I don't do Country, but I've heard some of my buddies produce a good twanky-tune from my Les Paul.  I have no problems playing some of Van Halen's stuff, Metallica or STP on my LP.  Love it or hate it...a Les Paul just can't be beat.  I prefer the Gibson Les Paul's, but "some" of the Epi's are good.  I love all the Epi Zakk Wylde models I have played (and damn it, I want one so bad!), but some of the other Epis are a little off.  I admit you will over-pay for a Gibson LP, but you will get a hand-crafted finish and a human to do QA on it.  With an Epi, you get a mass-produced ax with no QA.  However, it's up to you whether it's worth the price-drop or not.  Either one you choose, you will be getting a quality solid-body guitar with great tone and playability. 

As far as an SG...I have played one and it ROCKS.  But (for me) I like the feel, weight and presence of a Les Paul.  Personally, I think a Les Paul will leave an SG curled up in the corner...crying.  But then again...it all depends on the player.

Did I mention I wanted ALL the Epiphone Zakk Wylde models?

Sorry.  I think I am going to be sick.

Rock on!

Gibson Les Paul Studio (customized) * Epiphone Zakk Wylde Custom Les Paul "Camo" * Breedlove 6-string acoustic * Takamine 12-string acoustic/electric * Line 6 Spider III 212 150 * Line 6 FBV Shortboard * New tight skin-toned colored Spandex and matching thong *

For what it's worth: I have a Gibson SG Menace, a killer guitar. BUT, as I wrote I am a PRS man, and you should try the SE serie, look at www.zzounds.com or www.musiciansfriend.com to have an idea about the SG guitars. There are US GIBSON SG for a reasonable price.
It might be possible that if you go for an Epiphone, they have real good guitars, and my favourite is not the Epiphone SG 400 but the EPIPHONE SPECIAL SG, and also the cheapest (199$, I think) but that's a matter of taste.
If you like SG's, I should spend more $$ and having a Gibson SG.
Look at the prices on these sites, but take also a look on eBay, I did some really great business also because of the very strong €. If I go to a music store here, I will pay at least twice the price.
_____________________________________________________________________________

GITAARDOCPHIL SAIS: SG OR NOT SG

not much to add to this but i love me a sg

I'll break it down like this;

LesPauls have a very distinct sound but they're heavy. I recommend a wide strap to accomodate the weight of the guitar. This is the only down side to this guitar. As previous posters have said, this guitar is extremely versitile and will sound great playing any style of music.

SG's have a more common sound but the fretboard is more accesable than the Les Paul. The SG is a lighter guitar and a thin strap will be sufficient for this guitar.

Your best bet would be to go to your local music store and play each of guitars, through the same amp, and base your decision on your personal preferences of what moves you as a musician.

06sc500 Why Gibson and/or Fender, the difference? I noticed that more and more people start to use a telecaster, this one AND NO EFFECTS FOR ALL OF THEM, has a crystal clear sound, and is used more and more in Rock and Blues, the stratocaster, has 3 single coils (some 2 coils and a humbucker), also giving a sound more clear than Gibson. Gibson, also NO EFFECTS, has a deeper sound, more bass. and very good for all kinds of music. About the SG, well listen to AC/DC.
A MUST: go to www.gibson.com and search for the humbuckers. You can listen to different humbuckers that Gibson uses.

I have owned both a Les paul and an SG. Both of them are the best playing guitars I have ever played. I prefer the SG because it is lighter. Other than that they both play the same.

Well Gitaardocphil, I didn't sell my Les Paul I gave it to my friends son. He is just starting to learn to play and he wanted a les Paul really bad. Mine was just sitting around collecting dust so I gave it to him. But he is not allowed to sell it, break it or give it away. If he wants to do any of these things he has to give it back to me.

I stopped selling and trading them in a while ago. I will just collect them from now on.

Um, no. Not even close. I play blues, jazz, metal, rock, even classical on an SG. Derek Trucks plays blues on an SG. It's the player, not the guitar. Les Pauls are really not that versatile, neither are SG's. They will always sound comparatively darker and moodier than guitars with SC pickups. If you have not played both, you really don't know, I'm afraid.