A good rule of thumb to know when it's an inversion vs a whole different chord, is this:

*If the 3, 5 or 7 are the lowest note in the voicing - It's a 1st, 2nd or 3rd inversion.
*If the 9, 11 or 13 (i.e. 2, 4 or 6) are the lowest note in the voicing - it's perceived as a different chord.

For example, a G triad with an A in the bass will be perceived as an A7sus chord. This is one example of how one could go about re-harmonizing a progression. It's important to note however, that one must be careful to be certain that the new chord embraces the melody and does not clash against it (unless it's the clash they seek).

Hi Russell,

Regardless of how a chord is voiced, the root can not stop being the root of the chord. The root can be the lowest note in the voicing, the highest, or anywhere between... the root can even be omitted; but the root can never be a third, fifth, seventh, etc; nor can a root be a bR or #R as one might see a b3 or #11; nor can there be any more or less than one root per chord. If one were to re-harmonize a progression (e.g. Dmi7-Db7-Cmaj7 instead of Dmi7-G7-Cmaj7), they would in fact be exchanging one chord for another - each with respective unalterable roots.

That is admittedly a very brief and direct explanation, so please let me know if you would like further elaboration and in what way.

All the best,
Lee

3

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

That's preeeeetttyyy far-out, haha :-).

If you dig far out stuff, the composer Karlheinz Stockhausen is worth checking out! He was a big inspiration to The Beatles (he's on the sergeant pepper album cover actually), to Miles Davis and was among those who inspired Frank Zappa as well. He spent about 20 years in "acoustic laboratories" manipulating sine wavs and studying phonetics, to "compose a sound" and to eventually synthesis other sounds. He was a German composer who spoke several languages fluently and this video happened to be recorded in French. Karlheinz introduces the song and performs in it as well.

Microphone placement was definitely key here, as well... in fact, one guy on each side of the tam-tam is actually holding the mics used to record this and the mic distance from the epicenter is charted out, both in width and depth on the sheet music, as well as all the specific tools and motions used to produce various sounds.

Mikrophonie 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EhXU7wQCU0Y

4

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Here is another band that some might find intriguing. Hard to define, stellar musicianship and artistry. They did play with Zappa when they were young kids though, so that's gotta help.

The Mats and Morgan Band!

En schizofrens dagbok
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xsauw4Upv0

Hollmervalsen
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=di9xaUBKY5I

5

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Anyone heard of Sleepytime Gorilla Museum? My favorite album of theirs is probably "Of Natural History", but "In Glorious Times" is a super close second. Someone told me that one of the band members made his own instruments (strange ones) to play.

Greenless Wreath
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvyKzz5E0YM

6

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Awesome, man! Healy is great. I really like his last CD!

Where I live, the horrid "mainstream recording artists" are in fact what is featured on our local radio. It is slightly oppressive on the spirit, but also reminds one what is at stake. As I tell my friends in other states, "It is good to live close to the enemy." haha. Just as many of the mainstream are not musicians, I would say it is equally false to call them artists. Just as there are famous athletes, there are what I would call "famous celebrities"... people who are famous because they are famous. Every now and then a good records sneaks it way through the assembly line and becomes popular. Although, it might be occurring less frequently all the time. I happen to really like Christina Aguilera's first album from 1999, haha (don't hate me)... actually there is a moment of metric modulation on that album and some nice/clever harmony, funky synth tones not unlike parliament, plus the vocals are very strong and don't yet commit transgressions of non-stop, over-the-top, squiggly vocal shred. Also the production of the era has a very specific kind of elastic sound to it.

Something I like about Oingo Boingo and those bands we mentioned earlier, is how they have a pinpointable production sound (saying it's dated should be referring to the time that sound was born, not died; because sounds do not die, they become instruments).

In hind sight, I see that macro look into "overall sound" as what can be used in composition. Other examples would be warm analogue Beatles sound, old skewed EQ vinyl sounds of the 1920's, mondern ultra dynamic-less masters, orchestral recordings which are so dynamic that they are un-listenable in a car without playing DJ with the volume dial.

7

(14 replies, posted in Music theory)

One of the main differences of the pentatonic scale is that it isn't a staircase of whole steps and half steps. It has larger jumps and for that reason people like Dean Brown (Excellent jazz fusion player and super nice guy, played with Brecker Bros and others) say that the scale is already a melody, or as much a melody as it is a scale. Nothing need be discounted and likewise quality can't be determined by popularity. Pentatonics are a great way to solo without sounding like you are thinking of scales, especially if you alternate between pents over a each chord.

Shaw, you mentioned pents for C-F-G progression (I-IV-V). When looking at it as being a progression in Cmaj, we can then look at the harmonized scale and play minor pent from all of the minor chords in that progression (The ii-iii-vi chords, and of course that bonus one I mentioned earlier Bmi [the vii] to get all those ultra tasty chord/scale tones).

However... if those are played as a blues, then the chords would presumably be C7-F7-G7. That changes everything, because we can't see it in the key of Cmaj any longer. In the harmonized maj scale dominant chords are V chords, so we would view C7 as being in the key of F... that means we can play the min pent again from the ii-iii-vi chords, which would be Gmin pent, Amin pent and Dmin pent (also we can of course play Cmin pent if we bend the b3 up to a regular 3rd to achieve that bluesy sound).

Then applying that same thinking to to the F7 chord means that we can play: Cmin pent, Dmin pent and Gmin pent (Amin pent doesn't work anymore because you'd be playing a 7th over F dominant, which requires a b7). Also, as with all dom chords, you can play a min pent from the root as mentioned in the previous paragraph (this case being Fmin pent).

Then applying that same thinking to to the G7 chord means that we can play: Dmin pent, Emin pent and Amin pent. Also, a min pent from the root (this case being Gmin pent).

One last ultra awesome tip, is that whenever a dominant chord is a "functioning dominant", meaning it is the V of whatever follows it (i.e. C is the V of F, or G is the V of C, etc) you can play a min pent from a b3 up and you'll be playing a selection of notes from the altered scale. So if you are in a C7 blues and you are at the turn around, going from G7 back to C7, you can play Bbmin pent over the G7.

Here is a special treat! Skip to 2:25 for the solo, to catch this pentatonic super impositions in action :-).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlGq-qsjyvM

This talk has me encouraged to upload my Pent vids more frequently, hahaha. I do kind of have like 5 series running at the moment, which is fun and cool but it spreads my topics a little thin perhaps. On the other hand, maybe it's good, I mean an average person only takes 1 lesson a week anyway and 1-2 uploads a week for a single topic might be perfect. I'll have to think on that some more, probably.

8

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

"Bleeding guitar", hahahaha... funny expression. Yeah, that is some nice gee-tar playin' for sure :-). Thanks for sharing, this is something I probably wouldn't have discovered without someone directly telling me about or sending a link. Only one album? Shame.

9

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Hey, Funster! I just noticed you are from Nova Scotia! Any chance you've heard Patrick Healy's Lazarus Project? He is a local in your neck of the woods and pretty awesome. I bet you'll dig this, man. He's got a great mix of sounds going on, which includes a lot of the people we've been talking about. His new CD is really interesting... sort of a mix between intense and atmospheric, vibe-y fusion.

http://www.reverbnation.com/patrickhealyslazarusproject

I did a long promotional pre-sale and created a sampler with a bunch of people involved and he was a contributor. Great guitar player and Cool dude too. Worth befriending on FB and the like. Oh btw, I don't know if you use FB or not but feel free to hit me up on there:
https://www.facebook.com/lee.wanner

10

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Hey TwangTown, I looked up Crowded House because I thought I hadn't heard of them, but I recognize some of their stuff for sure. Man, seems like a pretty radical change from what I've heard so far between them and Split Enz. I'll have to check out both of those projects a bit more thoroughly. Got me curious.

11

(14 replies, posted in Music theory)

I hear ya, Shaw. What blew my mind when I was in school, was learning that the Pentatonic can be played in multiple places on the neck to achieve every mode of the Major scale (which includes the minor scale of course because the aeolian mode, the minor scale, is the 6th mode of the major scale). In fact, you can even play notes from the altered scale with the pentatonic scale.

I know this is a tad rushed because I have to run at the moment, but as an example of what I mean: people might want to try these sweet tips/tricks.

Over an Amaj7 chord, you can play:
Bmin pent (bit tense, many scale tones)
C#min pent (Really good sounding)
F#min pent (That's the relative minor)
and G#min pent (The hippest of all, has the 7, 9, 3, #11 and 13)!

I gotta finish up some some stuff here in the studio, but I'll come back to add some more tips later! Also, my vids will cover all that eventually. I plan to be concise but also step-by-step thorough :-).

12

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Hey, thanks for checking out my stuff, man :-)!

Oh ya, I own those Bruford albums! Have you heard UKZ? It's Jobson and a bunch of other great musicians/artists. A friend of mine plays that gig actually, Alex Machacek... his solo albums are fantastic. I'm a pretty big fan of his album "[sic]" with Terry Bozzio (I'm certain that you've heard Bozzio) and another named "24 tales" with Marco Minnemann. Actually, Marco played in UKZ too come to think of it. I did my first album with Marco, which was a thrill because I was a fan of his drumming since highschool. I'll attach a couple links in case you are interested or haven't heard Marco play:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x18SwHwfrrs
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU42cOwEvpM

I checked out Split Enz, Max Webster and Brand X now:

Split Ez sounds really good and has some pretty funny videos too, haha! Sort of remind me of Oingo Boingo (Who I really should listen to more of - note to self).

Max Webster kind of has hints of Pat Travers maybe? That Rush singer, Geddy Lee, ultra recognizable voice! Was he involved in that project the whole time?

Brand X - Man that is some old school fusion right there. Some of it made me think of Al Di Meola, who although I never got too deep into I does incorporate a lot of styles and genres (and epic chops of course). I checked you out that link you gave for "Disco Suicide" and also a really funky track named "Born Ugly"! I know how you feel about disco, hahaha... but then I'm a pretty big fan of Parliament and they were kind of inspired by disco (among other things). You never know what fruit can grow from well manured soil, right?

13

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

You mentioned some bands I haven't heard of and will have to check out, man! (Split Enz, Brand X, Max Webster)

I am a pretty huge Zappa fan I have to say. Aside from 60+ albums, everything he did to fight censorship?! What an awesome, dude! Oh and totes with the Jethro Tull. I seem to remember they Won best metal album of the year at one time when Metallica was also up for the nomination. I trust they also could have won best album of several genres that year :-). Steely Dan is amazing too... I don't know if you've heard the guitar player, Scott Henderson? He is one of my favorite Jazz/Rock guitar players and he said that he loved Steely Dan because they essentially had the harmonic depth of , but wrote great "pop" songs songs. Over course, we likely think differently of what is meant by the label "pop" these days, but you probably get his point.

One pretty alien artist, you may like, or even know about already... Allan Holdsworth.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=RDoE … hJbU1zbOeE

On a side note, I think it is true to say that what people refer to as "Pop" and "Avant Garde" can have great, great music. But I don't think those names really work for a genre. "Popular" doesn't seem accurate because if the Beatles came out today they would probably be called a fusion or alternative band, for having songs like "Live and Let Die" that go from orchestral-rock to reggae, etc... And Avant Garde means "new and unusual experimental ideas", which is totally appropriate as a concept, but as a genre people often fulfill certain idioms that are considered Avant Gard and contradict it. Names like Jazz, Rock, Blues, Metal, etc. all work best as names, because they have either been totally invented or been given new meaning at least. CRAY CRAY RAMBLING, sorry, haha.

I wanted to create a thread for people who want to make professional level recordings from their home on a small budget!

There are a lot of myth-like stuff about what it takes to get a good sound and a lot of people also tend to over-complicate things. Please hit me up if anyone has any questions and definitely don't hesitate if you have any tips and tricks of your own to contribute! We try to learn something new everyday, right?

I'm already excited about it, actually... all the things I have to say about mixing, EQing, Mics and Direct signals, sound proofing, etc, etc. I wish all this information would have been available to me back when I was just getting started.

It is true that in recording and mixing/mastering, there is personal preference and such involved, so I should probably go ahead and share some examples of work, that way you can determine for yourself if you think I could maybe offer some advice or tips etc.

My newest album - Funk Genre:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDtugNcQn24

My band's 2nd album - Mixed Genres
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9wgBdPAzjc

My first album with my band - Metal Genre:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOfK_mQG9XY

From my first album ever (Old school, haha) - Jazz/Rock genre:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x18SwHwfrrs
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UU42cOwEvpM

Let the recordings begin!

15

(13 replies, posted in Electric)

Hey, 77pinkbubbles77!

Good for you, persevering and prevailing like a boss :-D!

I don't happen to know anyone with dyslexia, so I'm not sure if these diagrams I made will be helpful, but they do happen to include the numeric interval of each note on them... also if it helps, you can see my hands just like in a private lesson. Oh and please, just like a private lesson, if you have any questions, hit me up :-)!

Here's the series (should be in a playlist). All the best :-)!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCYfKmO … TnX2OkqNRy

Thanks, Funster!

Huge props to you guys for being able to tackle stuff on your own. These days with sweet forums and stuff on the internet - self-teaching, so to speak is made ultra viable.

I had always had private lessons and eventually went on to the Musicians Institute in CA and I can say this much in regard to music theory; it's worth really comes through after what I would call some kind of third stage.

Example:
1st stage - Attaining general understanding of what the heck is going on with all this mumbo jumbo.
2nd stage - Knowing it... and particularly, I should add, how to apply it. Focusing on it's usefulness as a tool, rather than as an end in itself.
3rd stage - "Forgetting it". Not literally, haha, but after truly internalizing this stuff it becomes unconscious and effortless.

Main point:
Knowing theory has been an invaluable asset to me as an artists who creates original music. Knowing the theory means that when I sit down, I know exactly how to achieve the effect I want to create with a progression, how complex or direct/straight-forward it might be "emotionally" or "intellectually". Best of all, I don't have to sit around fishing for what I want when inspiration hits!

Analogy:
Stage 1 - Courtship
Stage 2 - Companionship
Stage 3 - Inter-dependant symbiosis

17

(0 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Hey guys, I've started a video series where each short video teaches how to play an open chord with a diagram and interval numbers included! Hope people find it helpful... I know sometimes it can be hard to learn these things without actually SEEING it played. I was never too good at learning from lesson books myself and always preferred being shown via private lessons, etc. Please, ask away if you have any questions and let me know if these videos are useful to you! I upload them super, super often. All the best :-).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZCYfKmO … TnX2OkqNRy

18

(20 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Hey, everybody!

This is a thread to discover and share bands that are difficult to "put a label on" or that infuse several genres together and can't really fit into a box, or even just straight up sound left field and/or alien to the norm.

I'll go ahead and get it started!

Rejectionary Art
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j9wgBdPAzjc

19

(14 replies, posted in Music theory)

Wow, EdShaw! That was a pretty thorough post, man!



I have started a series that will maybe be of some help to people? It will demonstrate all of the modes of the pentatonic scale in traditional and 3-note-per-string versions, talking about incorporating the blue note into all of those modes, as well as the 9 and 13, b13/#5, how and when those are applicable, etc... also how to super impose them over every kind of chord from different. Anyway, hope this helps :-)!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00IvdMp … mp;index=2

20

(0 replies, posted in Poems)

Hey guys, I am primarily an musician (artist) and I was on Chordie to see what the forums were like. I was pretty surprised to see a poetry section! This is awesome! Anyway, I occasionally to live readings. Check it out, maybe there will be something you like :-).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUbMvj6 … vF1wGVhAjr

Hey, DVC!

Jerome's answer was spot on! I'd like to give your question a shot, too... just in case I am able to add anything helpful.

People convert the letters into numbers, or rather intervals, because although the letters change for every key, the intervals of chords and scales do not. For example:

CDEFGABC
becomes
12345678

Two notes are cannot be a chord because they are only an interval, so the fundamental foundation of a chord must be three notes. Also chords can only be built by stacking thirds. This means that the most basic chord possible is a triad, meaning: 1-3-5 (Root-third-fifth).

Now the root can never change, but the 3rd and 5th can. So that gives us these variations.

Maj: R-3-5
Min: R-b3-5
Dim: R-b3-b5
Aug: R-3-#5

Augmented triads are kind of rare; but if you wanna hear a good example, check the intro to "Stardust" by Nat King Cole.
Diminished chords are a lot more common; they often act as transitions between diatonic chords. Check out the Jazz standard "Bewitched" as an example.

Now, about the 7... The seven is just following the formula used to find triads, stacking 3rds.

Most common 7th chords:
Maj7 chord: 1-3-5-7
Min7 chord: 1-b2-5-b7
(Dom)7 chord: 1-3-5-b7

Notice that those 7th chords are built from the Maj and Min triads. Other 7th chords can be build from Dim and Aug triads.

So now about the 9, 11, 13... you may have noticed that while stacking thirds, we skipped over the 2, 4 and 6. A quick recap:
CDEFGABC = 12345678

Well 8 is the same as 1 again, C and C. If we stack thirds beyond the point of 1-3-5-7, well moving a third over 7 will pass over 8 and lands at 9, which is the same as two... check it out, CDEFGABCD = 123456789. C is 1 also 8. D is 2 and also 9. A third above the 2/9 is 4/11. A third above 4/11 is 6/13.

9, 11 and 13 are considered extensions or scale tones. as where 1-3-5-7 are considered chord tones. Anything in between a chord tone and a scale tone are passing tones.

Hope that helps.

P.S. A quick tip, try adding a 9, just as an example, to any chord you play. It's never a "wrong" note, unless you are playing with someone who knows to altered a functioning Dom chord.

All the best, dudes! Check out my youtube channel if you want to see some videos with weird chord voicings (and normal ones too) and other lessons :-).

Hey guys, I'm new to Chordie! I wanted to test out the forums by sharing some videos that people might find helpful. I upload at least one video a day, but often more. In this series, for example, I take one shape and then teach what kinds of chords you can play with that shape. Some shapes can be used to play 4-5 different chords (Maj, Min, Sus, Dom, Altered, etc)! Let me know if you find it helpful and if you have any questions :-).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmbWFaxXXB0