1,601

(5 replies, posted in Music theory)

You have deduced correctly, mostly.  big_smile

The reason "B sharp" and "E sharp" seem to disappear is because there is only a half step between B and C, and a half step between E and G.  Since you know about half tones and whole tones, you should be able to understand what makes a major scale.   It's that series of intervals.

R W W H W W W H

Take C major

C D E   F  G  A B  C
R W W H  W W W H

Notice that it is a half step that takes you from E to F and from B to C.    As it happens, whatever key you are in, you simply don't find those intervals.  They *do* exist, and you may sometimes find it (harp music, for example, has a lot in E#) but for the vast wide majority, the aren't there.   Fb and Cb as well.

1,602

(19 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

I watched the luge accident.  It was awful.  I knew as soon as I saw it that the kid was dead.   He came off the luge at the bottom of the run going about 130kmh, hit a pole, and came to a complete stop almost instantly.   It reminded me of Dale Earnhart's fatal accident.   All that speed and no where to scrub off the energy.

Tragic.

1,603

(19 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

It will be interesting, that's for sure.   The winter here has been entirely mild, and they are having snow problems at the event site.  And by "problem"  I mean "There is no snow."    There's snow at Whistler, but at Cypres, which is at a lower elevation, they've had the artificial snow machines going for weeks, and are using helicopters and buckets to bring in more from higher elevations.

I was up in Victoria a few weekends ago (about 100 miles from Whistler) and it felt like spring.

1,604

(6 replies, posted in Music theory)

Fundamentally that's it.   The reason it works is because of the major scale.

If you look at C major, it's  C D E F G A B C

Take a look at the notes.   The F is the fourth note and the G is the fifth note.   When we refer to the IV or the V, that's what we mean.   The circle lets us find the IV and the V easily, for any scale.   Simply pick the root, and the next note in a clockwise direction is the V, and the note behind it is the IV.

G, for example.

G A B C D E F# G

Check it out on the wheel, and see it work!

As you work into it, you'll find that *every* note is available this way.  Walk three over, and you'll find the VI, for example, which will give you the relative minor.  It's a handy thing to have.

1,605

(6 replies, posted in Music theory)

"How you get flats and sharps" is best demonstrated on a piano keyboard.   You get them by maintaining the half step whole step interval pattern necessary to create a major scale.

Play the C major scale on a keyboard.  Count how many black keys you hit.   Compare to the key signature for C.

Then play the G scale on a keyboard.  Count how many black keys you hit.  Compare to the key signature for G.

It will all make sense when you can see it laid out in those terms,   but the fretboard makes it a little confusing.

1,606

(6 replies, posted in Music theory)

It is *exactly* this kind of response that drives me to do the things I do.   It makes every minute I put into this worth while.   smile

Mr. Tooter has it just right.   Any chord within 4 frets is entirely true.   I always say there are only 5 things you have to know in order to play guitar.  C  A  G  E  and D.   Learn those shapes anywhere on the neck, and you're golden.

1,608

(31 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

tonyespo wrote:

Jerome, I agree and disagree.  My strings are so high that it makes it painful to play.  I do practice and I understand there is pain involved in learning.  However once my guitar is setup properly I will be able to devote more time to practice and less time to healing my fingers.  My strings started out at 6/32.  They are down to 5/32 and I would love to get them to 3/32.

Your fingers are going to hurt no matter how your rig is set up.  It's a simple fact of life.   The 1st order of business for anyone learning to play is to get rid of their monkey hands, and turn them into player's hands.  That hurts, and requires dedicated practice.   A difference of 3/32 of an inch isn't going to mean a whole lot in that regard.

I know guys that carry extra saddles in their kit and change them out with every gig in order to compensate for temperature, humidity, and other environmental factors that can effect the neck.   But these are dudes that have been playing for years, and understand what that means, and how it effects their playing.   We are not such people.   What I'm hearing you say is that "I can't practice effectively because my guitar isn't set up perfectly."  And I simply don't believe that.   You can't practice effectively because you're not practicing enough, as is common with new players.

Having a well set up instrument is nice.  But unless it's *seriously* mangled, it's going to be just fine for your needs.   The old golf adage of "It's not the arrow, it's the Indian" is just as true with guitars.   You could run out and spend $5,000 on a perfectly set up Martin or Taylor, and you are still going to have sore hands, you are still going to struggle to fret properly, and you are still going to sound like a n00b.  An experienced player could pick up your rig right now, and they'd sound like they knew what they were doing.   

I have a Tak I'm working on that had the nut come lose and rotate under the strings.  The result was an action at the nut that was more akin to a dobro than a guitar.  But it was playable, even if it wasn't the greatest feeling neck in the world.   A bad setup sucks, but it's not the end of the world, and it shouldn't stop you from practicing.

I tell new students the following when they tell me their hands hurt.

"Your hands hurt?  Your hands don't hurt enough!"

You don't have to be a masochist to play, but it helps.  big_smile

1,609

(31 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

I think the next step is to practice, and quit tweaking on the guitar.

You're a new player.  You are going to have problems fretting well, especially in the beginning.   A well set up instrument is a dream, but it shouldn't be an impediment to you practicing.

So I'd play with it less, and play it more.  big_smile

1,610

(16 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

tubatooter1940 wrote:

Every geographic location has it's list of local favorites. Hanging out a jam sessions and open mikes will give you an idea what the locals like to play. I could make a list of South Alabama faves and half of them you may know.
As Zurf stated, some songs are known world wide.
I played a country song at a pub in Kinsale, Ireland, titled "Friends in Low places" by Garth Brooks. I did not know Garth Brooks was touring Ireland at that time. Every Irishman and woman in the joint knew all the lyrics and sang along with great gusto. What a happy surprise that was.Around here, most guitar players know "Wildwood Flower" by the Carter Family,"Sweet Home Alabama" by Lynard Skynard,"Walk Don't Run' and "Pipeline" by the Ventures, "Knocking on Heaven's Door' by Bob Dylan, "Can't You See" by Marshall tucker - just to name a few.
toots

Bars full of singing Irishmen is one of the best things about the place.   A sing/song is a traditional aspect of the society.    I knew I loved the place when I walked into a packed pub and 300 people were singing "I would walk 500 miles...." at the top of their lungs.  smile

1,611

(2 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

I don't think the name of a band is nearly as important as how it's translated into a logo.  Van Halen, RHCP, The Rolling Stones...  They all have iconic symbols that are easily recognizable,  prints well, and works on everything from stationary to t-shirts.

1,612

(8 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Study your 7's and extended 7ths (9th, 11th, and 13ths) and you'll be fine.  Jazz is a great way to expand your chord vocabulary.

1,613

(11 replies, posted in Acoustic)

zguitar wrote:

Sorry Gabe 4 hijacking your post.


Nela,

I think it's awesome that you are giggin after being self taught. Whatever works for you keep doiing it. I hope I'm that good when I hit 4 years. I've only been at it for a little over a year now. Self taught also. Actually, not SELF taught, I steal songs from youtube.

Well, if what you want is to just play songs, then you probably won't need it.  But I think what you're going to find is that playing purely by rote is going to get boring real quick, and you'll find you've plateaued, and need some place to grow.

1,614

(11 replies, posted in Acoustic)

I always try to find out what retail is for a new one.

http://www.google.com/products?q=Simon+ … mp;show=dd

I don't know if you can find your guitar in there, but it's a good place to start.

1,615

(11 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Indi is going to crush the Jets.

The Aints and the Vikes, though, is going to be an epic game.  Those are two outstanding teams, so I'd hate to call it one way or another.   The Vikes D + Brett Farve is potent, but NO can pretty much score on demand.

Either way, whoever wins that, plus Indianapolis in the SuperBowl makes it a game worth watching.

1,616

(11 replies, posted in Acoustic)

"Strumming pattern" doesn't really have any musical meaning.    Rhythm, tempo, and dynamics do.  Chord charts (and tablature in general) don't have a good way to describe those things.

That is, for any given rhythm, there are usually a couple of ways you can strum it.   Understanding how standard notation describes rhythm is a great thing to know, as it can accurately describe the rhythm that the song needs.  It's up to you as a musician to come up with a strumming pattern that matches that.

1,617

(6 replies, posted in Music theory)

Anyone that has ever talked to me or taught me to play leads or solo has told me to "sing what you're playing."   I never knew it had a name, though.

1,618

(2 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

I got a chuckle out of this.  Apparently, the airline finally fixed his stuff.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5YGc4zOqozo

1,619

(8 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Learn a single scale pattern.  If you know one scale pattern, you can play in any key.

1,620

(11 replies, posted in Music theory)

Astronomikal wrote:

Thanks for the replies, everyone.


@jerome:  He played the open A.  This is what I thought was weird.  In fact, if I remember correctly, he fretted the low E with his index finger and the high E with his middle finger.  I thought it was pretty sloppy, but I'm not a guitar teacher, and I thought, well, maybe the teacher knows something I don't.  Strike that -- he probably knows a great many things about the guitar that I don't.  But still . . .

Yeah, then he's not playing G.

This is one of the things I don't like about "rote" teaching techniques, and why I think it's so critical to lay down a foundation of basic theory as early as possible.   Just a little bit of theory, and this kid could have figured it out on his own that he wasn't playing what he thought he was playing.  "Yeah, that's a D, but *why* is it a D, and find me two other D's on the fretboard.

1,621

(8 replies, posted in Acoustic)

If you are going to play lead, you gotta know scales.  If you know scales, you can play lead.

1,622

(3 replies, posted in Music theory)

Well, I would apply Occam's razor, and guess that it was simply a typo.  smile

I'm not sure what you mean by "old chord theory," though.  Diatonic scales and their related chords go back at least to the 1600's.   

The sus vs add thing still won't work.  In a sus chord, there is no 3rd at all.  In an add chord, there is.  It would be entirely appropriate to play Amadd4 (or 11, if you like), but there is no such thing as AmsusX, or A major sus 4, either.   The 3rd is where the major/minor quality comes from.  So a sus chord is neither major or minor.   Amsus4 to Amadd11 is still more than just moving the D up an octave, as you add the 3rd as well.   Does that make sense?

1,623

(11 replies, posted in Music theory)

I don't have an issue using the thumb to mute, but if the kid is striking an open A, he's not playing a G, he's playing Gadd2.

1,624

(11 replies, posted in Music theory)

Russell_Harding wrote:

it is what it is a slash chord C/E the note to the left of the slash / is C this is the chord, the note to the right of the slash / is E this is the Lowest note played in the Chord and this is true for any slash chord ////// smile

Yep.  This is how you would notate an inversion, which is what this is.

1,625

(3 replies, posted in Music theory)

Well, there is a difference between a sus4 and add11.  Suspended (sus) chords "suspend" the 3rd and add the 4th, while an "add" chord, simply adds the appropriate note to a triad.

That aside, that is an interesting notation.  Minor suspended 4 chords don't really make sense, as it would be identical to a plain old sus chord.  You suspend the 3rd, which is where the chord gets it's quality from.  In other words, the thing that makes a chord major or minor goes away in a sus chord.

Amsus4  would be A D E
Asus4 would also be A D E

Anyway, Asus4 isn't what's noted there.  That is plain old 1st position A.

Asus4 is 002230 or or 000230, if you like.  Point is, get rid of the C# (or C, if you're in Am) and add a D.