The one that comes to mind immediately for me is "Windmills of your Mind" (Les moulins de mon cœur) which has been a hit for a number of artists. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Windmills_of_Your_Mind

Another is "If you go away" ("Ne me Quitte pas" - another song by Brel) which has been a hit for many others in its English version.
See here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_You_Go_Away

There is also "Yesterday when I was Young" (Original French lyric by, I think, Charles Aznavour)

Also Leonard Cohen's "The Partisan" is translated and adapted from the original French.

102

(10 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

jerome.oneil wrote:

Just curious about the term "Grand Slam."

It comes from American Baseball (the greatest game ever) meaning a batter hits a home run (swats the ball out of the park) while all three bases have runners, scoring four points.

How is the term used over on the other side of the pond?  From whence does it stem?

In this context (Rugby Union Football) and the 6 Nations Trophy, it means that the team wins the Grand Slam that beats all the other 5 nations. In this case: England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, France and Italy. Ireland won all their matches and so win the Trophy. Wales did the same last year.

103

(10 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Well done the Irish!
For all those who made it over here, it was a great day in the City.
We'll win it back next year though, don't worry. smile

104

(14 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

gitaardocphil wrote:

I use this band to ask a question: what is in fact the difference between a monkey and an ape?

You can eat monkey nuts but I wouldn't try ape.

105

(10 replies, posted in Songwriting)

The problem is caused by the fact that most of the fonts are "proportional". That is, the space between characters depends on the width of the character. In other words, W takes up more space on the line than I.
The way round this is to use the font called courier new. This is a "monospaced" font, which means that all letters, irrespective of their width, take up the same space on a line.
Using courier for text and chord letters should keep the two together even if you change the font size.
The font does look a little odd, though, to most eyes.

106

(24 replies, posted in Music theory)

Krapyl wrote:

Hey Stonebridge, thank you for your explanation!
I went back to the sticky posts, and found I can play those scales, I even figured out the roman numbering, I have always wanted to do that, when hearing people practising scales.
I will practise them a little evry day, and hope that my brain, and hands, just knows it automaticly one day.
I also know that its hard to come up with anything original from just using them as they are, but it souns cool just throwing in some of them in and between chords.
You also write Swdish better than me:) I am from Norway, living just across the border.

Best regards
Ståle

Hi Ståle
I lived in Sweden (for about 4 years) many years ago but I still remember and understand the language. I don't know the part of Sweden where you live - I lived in the South East and then up in the North. I have been to Norway, too. Bergen, Voss and the Hardanger Fjord a couple of times on holiday. Norway is a beautiful part of the world.

107

(15 replies, posted in Recording)

Russell_Harding wrote:

You all (some many) are entitled to your collective opinions but I like to record with a little reverb when I AM singing it sounds good and I feel better singing I dont like a dry microphone unless its at a pta meeting

The dry microphone problem is solved by feeding your reverb back though the monitor/headphones while recording the vocal but not onto the track being recorded. Of course, that may or may not be possible depending on the recording system and desk you are using. You need good auxiliary routing facilities from the main inputs.
The result is you can hear your voice while recording with as much reverb as you want, without laying the reverb down onto the track.

108

(15 replies, posted in Recording)

Da iawn phill.
Graceland was released in 1986. Back in 1986 I had my own 8-track studio, tape based of course, and various digital reverb units. There would be no earthly reason why reverb should be recorded onto a track even then. Any reverb could be added at mixdown. To record it onto a track would have been considered "incorrect" and totally unnecessary.
I once remember, before I knew better, recording a vocal and adding reverb at the time onto the track. It sounded ok then as the cheap reverb I had was all I could afford.
A year later, when I wanted to remix the tape with my new expensive reverb unit, I was stuck with the god-awful reverb I had put there a year previously. There was no way I could get rid of it. The lesson was, and still is, record tracks dry. With current technology there is no need whatsoever to do otherwise.
re the Paul Simon track. It baffles me.

109

(15 replies, posted in Recording)

Are you saying the reverb was actually recorded on the track, rather than the bass being recorded dry? That is unusual. It's normal to record dry and add reverb or other effects at mix down. Once you record reverb on a track you can't get rid of it. Did the bass guitarist use reverb when playing, maybe?
As for using reverb generally with bass guitar (or other bass instruments), personally I would not normally use any, or maybe a tiny amount. Too much can swamp the mix. You would need some sort of EQ to redress the balance.
Just my personal views here.

110

(24 replies, posted in Music theory)

Krapyl wrote:

Ahh, at last I thought! They are explaining 1-6-4-5 or 3rd- 5ths- 7ths, but NO. I can play a lot of them cause I know the chords, I have tried to see if there`s a regular pattern, in witch to play them, but can`t say I find any, exept in barre chords.
Where do you count? In pentatonic scale, i.e. A-C  D-E  G-A  C-D  F-G#  A-C, will that be 1-2-3-4-5-6-7-8-9-10-11-12 or
5-8 5-7 5-7 5-7 5-8 5-8 or is it in C scale C-D-E-F-G-A-B-C how can G Em C D be 1 6 4 5 then?
                                                          1 2 3 4 5 6  7 8                                                                                                                   
This is so confusing that I don`t understand most of what they are teaching in courses, should you count in the spesific scale you are playing or what?
Also, to make a complete fool of myself smile Is the top line of six, always the high E string, from top E B G D A E ?
I do not expect an easy answer to this, cause I have been wondering for years!
Would also appresiate a link to somewhere they explain this in an understandable way. Hard to be a dyslectic!
Peace Ståle

It sure is confusing!
1-6-4-5 refers to the notes in the scale of the key you are playing in. It assumes you are using a standard (8 note) octave.
So to answer your question about G Em C D
In the key of G, the major scale is
GABCDEF#G numbered 12345678
1 is G
6 is Em
4 is C
5 is D

If you are playing in the key of C, you have the major scale
CDEFGABC numbered 12345678
1 is C
6 is Am
4 is F
5 is G

The C-Am-F-G is just a typical chord progression that harmonises a very large number of songs in the key of C. If the song is in G then the same progression would be G-Em-C-D.

It was a much used progression in 50s music, and still is today, I suspect.

Your question about scales other than the standard 8 note major and minor scales is more difficult. In my experience, it's possible to number the notes either way, but the most common, for me, has been to always use the 8-note system when indicating which note of the scale a chord is based on.
Even if you use a pentatonic scale for your melody, most musicians will still be thinking in terms of an 8 note scale when it comes to the harmonic structure.
So if you are using a 5-note scale, in C that goes
C-D-E-G-A-C for example, I will still be thinking that this scale only uses the notes numbered 1-2-3-5-6-8. In other words, your tune does not use notes 4 or 7 (F and B) of the scale. It also means that you might want to avoid chords with those 2 notes in, or at least chords based on those notes. However, that is a complex issue. For example, I could imagine harmonising a song using that scale above with a chord based on F (the 4th note of the C major scale) even though the melody never uses that note. For example, the notes A and C in the scale, are both contained in the chord of F major, even though F itself is not in the scale.
The decision is one for you to make. There is no "rule" as such in composition, other than "does it sound ok?". Ultimately, the ear is the judge, not the rulebook.

Vänliga hälsningar

111

(3 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Good advice Doug. You reminded me to point out that the neck on the Walden is much thinner than a standard classical, but the fretboard is the same width. This makes it a little easier to play.
I original learnt on a classical many years ago and it's nice to play one again.
Don't forget that Leonard Cohen used (still uses?) a nylon string too.

112

(30 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Radchael1975 wrote:

Hi Stonebridge. Thats a nice idea. I do have a few friends that play guitar (MUCH better than me though, lol)  I have played (or does 'jammed' sound better...?!?!?) with someone else a few times and it is fun.  I do love to share my music. I dont suffer 'stage fright' and get all embarrassed when someone listens. As you say, would really kind of defeat the object..!!!

You made a good point there. It's much more productive to get together with someone who is better than you as you can learn from him/her, and the act of playing together will stretch you and promote your progress.
It's fun working on arrangements for two guitars, or, if the other person plays a different instrument, working out the part for that.
Also, singing harmonies is fun. I know some people who find harmonising really difficult, others take to it naturally.

113

(30 replies, posted in Acoustic)

It's easy to get into this position. The way out is to set yourself a (new) goal. After I had been learning for a similar time I got to the stage of "now what?". It really depends on why you wanted to learn in the first place and what your goal is or was. For me, the next step was to get together with others who play and make some music together. That doesn't necessarily mean a band, although that could be fun. It also meant, for me, playing some songs at a local folk club.
Although I accept that for many people, learning and playing "at home" just for their own enjoyment is their goal, for me that rather misses the point of making music. It should be shared with others. (In my humble opinion of course)

114

(3 replies, posted in Acoustic)

You can get a good one for £200!
It's a minefield just like buying a steel string. Everyone will tell you their guitar is just brilliant.
So here goes!
I decided to get a classical last summer and, after trying out a few in the local shop I went for a Walden "Natura". Walden makes a nice range of classicals. They are not expensive but are well made and sound good. Most are in your price bracket. My N730 was only £200. Best 200 I ever spent.
www.waldenguitars.com
A couple of people who play much better classical than I do, have both expressed admiration for the sound it produces.
So there's me telling you how great mine is... wink

115

(5 replies, posted in Songwriting)

Don't feel you have to stick to a formula when writing a song.
As for the 2nd verse, it depends very much on the song, and how many other verses there are.
If you are telling a story, the 2nd verse just continues that story. Don't tell it all in the 1st verse.
If you are declaring your love or your state of mind, the 2nd verse should just be developing the theme started in the 1st. So, as a general "rule" the 2nd verse is either a continuation of the theme from the 1st, or a development of the idea from the 1st. Having said that, and going back to my 1st statement in this post - it doesn't have to be that way!

116

(2 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

upyerkilt wrote:

also the scottish paper " the daily record" thought since everyone in the world was feeling the effects of this money thing ( i hate the term "credit crunch" )it would put the price up by 5p to 40p, even though i cannot remember ever seeing any notification of this.
I would have thought the price would have come down since the government slashed 2.5% off tax. so now the newsagents and the printing factory are all making more money from us paper buying public.

its good to know they care

Ken

There's no VAT on newspapers.
I think they make most of their money from advertising rather than the cover price. Even so, when they put the price up, you are right, it's not the sort of news they want to print!
Our local paper is the same. Over the last year or so the price has gone up by one or two pence a number of times from 40p up to 47p.

117

(24 replies, posted in Music theory)

"All I Have to do is Dream"  - Everly Brothers, comes immediately to mind.
But, as with most songs like this, there is a middle 8 with a different chord progression.

118

(6 replies, posted in Acoustic)

It's a long time ago but I first played a guitar in Summer 1971, and first performed in late 1972 or early 1973. The memory is a bit hazy.

119

(2 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

Classical (nylon) strings are always under less tension than steel. That's the nature of nylon strings and classical guitars. It's probably not a good idea to put high tension strings on as the guitar is not built to withstand the extra force.
Fret buzz is more likely to occur with lower tension strings, as they vibrate with greater amplitude. Higher tension gives potentially less buzz.
On the other hand, lower tension strings are easier to fret as you require less finger pressure.
My advice is to stick with the strings you have.
I have put some Aquila "Alabastro" normal tension strings on my classical. These come in high and normal tension varieties.
Even the normal tension strings give a much harder/brighter sound (than nylon strings) and may be to your liking. They are made from a special compound (Nylgut) that makes them feel and sound more like gut strings. Of course, they are a little more expensive too!

120

(7 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

The band played one of their songs and I was asked to join in. (I knew what the song was beforehand). It seemed more important that they liked me rather than my playing, so long as it was reasonable.

121

(4 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

autoharptom wrote:

Can someone tell me what chord can be substituted for "E Major"?

If you could tell us the song, and which E chord it is, there are plenty on here who can help.

122

(18 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Merry Christmas all
or
Nadolig Llawen
as we say in Wales.

Hi Zen. Just one thing popped into my head regarding the key. I have been to so many such services where the key chosen was too high, and very few people were able or willing to join in!

Away in a Manger probably needs to be in G rather than C, if you want to give the most people a chance of getting the most notes in their vocal range.

Good luck.

Edited to add. I'm referring to the tune usually sung in the UK (by WJ Kirkpatrick)
There may be other tunes out there.

124

(4 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Strumming the strings in different places encourages or inhibits the presence of different harmonics in the string's vibration. This in turn creates a different colour in the notes produced.
(I just wrote a load about this in the music theory section at the end of the "Open chords to power chords" thread. Odd you should mention this just now)

125

(17 replies, posted in Music theory)

Maybe I could answer that one. I have studied the physics of sound and can concur with flatliner.
A vibrating string, for example the low E string, will sound its fundamental frequency, the E, by vibrating along its whole length. (Say 25 inches for the sake of example). However, the string also vibrates in other "modes" such that it appears to vibrate along half its length, third its length, quarter its length, fifth its length and so on. These are called higher harmonics or overtones*. Each higher "harmonic" (or overtone) is weaker than the previous. So you tend to hear the lowest (fundamental) tone and the presence or absence of the higher harmonics colours the sound you hear. For example, playing near the bridge encourages higher harmonics and consequently colours the tone of the note.
Now the tricky bit. The harmonics create notes which relate to the fundamental (lowest tone) in a mathematical sequence. The 2nd harmonic (where the string vibrates along half its length) is twice the frequency of the fundamental. This creates a note an octave higher than the fundamental. This note sounds with the fundamental and colours the tone. The next harmonic (string vibrates in 3rds) produces a note 3 times the frequency of the fundamental, and is an octave plus a fifth (13 notes) above the fundamental. So if the fundamental was a C, the 2nd harmonic is C above that and the 3rd is the G above that. It goes on. The next harmonic produces the octave above that, and the 5th produces the third of the chord (the E) above that.

Guitarists can force these harmonics to sound by touching a finger on the vibrating string.
If you touch at the 12th fret you force the string to vibrate in two halves, producing the 2nd harmonic, an octave above the fundamental. If you touch the string at the 4th fret you force the 5th harmonic, which is the 3rd of the chord. (On the bottom E string you would get a G#)
If your guitar string is is 25 inches long, the 5th harmonic (the 3rd of the chord) is encouraged by playing or strumming about 7 or 8 inches from the bridge. On my acoustics, this is just above the sound hole. Plucking the E string hard here, and listening, one can hear the 3rd of the chord (the G#) sounding quite clearly.
The same applies to electrics.
Hope this helps.
* There is a lot of confusion and disagreement over the meaning of the words overtone and harmonic. I have used the convention where the lowest note (fundamental) is also called the 1st harmonic. The 2nd harmonic, the octave above, is referred to as the 1st overtone, and so on.