Search options (Page 33 of 43)
Russell_Harding wrote:Geo I appreciate your comment its a fun song to chord i wish i could post the chord progression but theres a lot of differn't things going on at the same time and its all very syncopated with the changes occuring as anticipatitons so it would be tough for me to chart out, but for Jerome it would be a snap (maybe)
geoaguiar wrote:Nicely done Russell, a very good groove.
Don't share all your trade secrets!!!! Sometimes I just enjoy listening too. I guess that's what got me hooked into playing anyhow. I'm a fan 1st, a player 2nd.
last_rebel wrote:geoaguiar wrote:Agreed last_rebel. And for some legitimate bands the video thing actually helped. I'd have to say I enjoyed the pre-MTV ZZ Top stuff way more than the Eliminator album but it was a huge commercial success. And having a blues based commercial success is good. It might make someone dive into the genre and find great little known artists. I'm not saying MTV is bad but I think it was bad for popular music. Do you think the Back Street Boys and N'Sync would have had the commercial success they realized had it not been for MTV? If you listen to the music (and I personally try not to) it wouldn't hold up well against most unsigned artists. I'm not saying they're talentless or they suck just that the music doesn't stand by itself. It's part of the marketed package and without the package there's no success.
Oh yeah I agree with you, 99% of mainstream artists played on the MTV make me literally sick to my stomache. And also, it seemed like when it all first started catching on, that it was a Rock thing but now theres as much hip-hop and R&B on there as anything...
That being said, the idea of the music video isn't all together bad (like with the ZZ Top thing, it gives good bands another way to connect with thier fans and get thier new singles out there), but seems to me like they took it too far, making the visual more important than the sound. And MTV pushes certain bands and artists down your throat, which I guess would be a great oppurtunity for an artist, but the standards they use to choose WHICH bands seems to be based on how they can market looks and ot music.
Well said and exactly correct.
Well James, you've just changed my way of thinking. here I was thinking MTV was useless and crap but it actually does serve a purpose. It reminds us all why it's better to play music than to watch MTV
Doc,
Do you think it's even more amazing given the lack of technology during the Beatles era? They were produced but not in the manner they can be today. They had to be a lot more inventive back then. If you listen to a Beatles or Pink Floyd album today it still sounds awesome. It's a testament to the artists and the producer. Amazing considering the tools available to todays artists. I think these artist were special...very special. The right combination of personalites and musical talents in the right situation.
Do you think image and videos have changed the music creation process. Madonna doesn't have to put a quality album with 12 great tracks; there's no pressure. fans are going to pack the house because of her image. She's not going to show up with a stool and a six string and blow you away. Every once in while I hear an album that restores my faith in music. It's usually on an independant label (but not always). I keep exploring new genres and keep an open mind.
Agreed last_rebel. And for some legitimate bands the video thing actually helped. I'd have to say I enjoyed the pre-MTV ZZ Top stuff way more than the Eliminator album but it was a huge commercial success. And having a blues based commercial success is good. It might make someone dive into the genre and find great little known artists. I'm not saying MTV is bad but I think it was bad for popular music. Do you think the Back Street Boys and N'Sync would have had the commercial success they realized had it not been for MTV? If you listen to the music (and I personally try not to) it wouldn't hold up well against most unsigned artists. I'm not saying they're talentless or they suck just that the music doesn't stand by itself. It's part of the marketed package and without the package there's no success.
Nicely done Russell, a very good groove.
I've used quite a few in my time. I used to be a Systems Admin so I experimented with most all of them. They all have their strengths and weaknesses. I used to say Norton was the best but I think in the last few versions it has become too controlling. For advanced users, we know the risk but should still be allowed to easily "set the antivirus aside" to complete a task. And of course, they're all memory hogs and resource pigs. But in todays internet, they're almost a neccessity. I ran my business laptop without antivirus for a couple of years without incident but browsing was minimal and I scan my email @ the server level.
I'm currently using MacAfee; it's OK at best.
Roger, I too have heard that Avira is good. Maybe I'll try that next. And Doc, Roger is definitely right on in saying that using 2 antivirus programs @ the same time is chaos. If you are using 2 I'm suprised the 1st one let the 2nd one install itself.
mixter102 wrote:geoaguiar wrote:If no one watched then it wouldn't be popular. We have no one to blame but ourselves. Someones watching MTV. I didn't know they still played videos
Dude, I aint watchin' it. So I get to blame everyone else.
Its not me either. MTV is extremely popular. There are thousands of users here @ Chordie and they represent a pretty wide age and interest range. I'll be they're are some MTV watchers out there. I'm old enough to remember it when it first came out and it was cool. But then as time went on the video product seemed eclipse the music and that's when it got ugly. And as I said, its everyone fault. Who would you rather see half naked: Beyonce and Madonna or Lemmy From Motorhead and Tom Waits....I rest my case.
upyerkilt wrote:The person to inspire me to write my first song was Syd Barrett.
Ken
Yuo didn't shave your head and eye brows did you? Agreed...great songs from an extremely disturbed person. What a shame
If no one watched then it wouldn't be popular. We have no one to blame but ourselves. Someones watching MTV. I didn't know they still played videos
SouthPaw41L wrote:What is the relevance to this post and Chordie?
the 10 best ways to waste 10 seconds perhaps?
I think they were all great but I think Lennon was the best songwriter. Some of his solo stuff was powerful. You mentioned Imagine...also Working Class Hero, Jealous Guy, etc. There were way too many to mention.
I think Paul was probably more commercially successful and he and George were no slouches but I gotta give the egde to John. Ringo was just Ringo. IMO just happy to be on the ride.
Roger Guppy wrote:GoodbyeBlueSky wrote:Find a singer with a song you like who has a similar voice to you. Try Bright Eyes, the singer doesn't have an amazing voice, but he writes the songs to fit his voice, and has great lyrics which makes it sound like he can actually sing. Bob Dylan too.
-Kerry-
Hi Kerry,
All a matter of opinion really, but I think that Art Garfunkel has an incredible voice and is one of my favourite singers. I only wish I could reach the high notes that he is able to.
By the way "Bright Eyes" was written by Mike Batt and was the feature song of the film "Watership Down".
Roger
Bright Eyes is out of Omaha NE USA (I think). Unique vocals and great songwriting. I assume the name is a Planet of the Apes reference. Charlton Heston's character was nicknamed Bright Eyes when he couldn't speak in captivity.
KAP54 wrote:Tough to pick top five......S-o-o-o many have inspired me over time.
1) David Gilmour
2) Eric Clapton
3) Stevie Ray Vaughn
4) Jeff Healy
5) Walter Rossi (1972 "Charlee" Album)
Thanks for giving Gilmour the credit he deserves. He's my favorite but I feel doesn't get nearly the recognition he deserves. His work on Wish You Were Here and Animals is (in my opinion) the best stuff ever laid down.
GoodbyeBlueSky wrote:Find a singer with a song you like who has a similar voice to you. Try Bright Eyes, the singer doesn't have an amazing voice, but he writes the songs to fit his voice, and has great lyrics which makes it sound like he can actually sing. Bob Dylan too.
-Kerry-
Nice Bright Eyes reference!!!! A unique voice indeed. Fantastic songwriting.
Shawshank Redemption...powerful story about friendship. Heavy without being sappy.
Russell makes good recommendations. I struggle with it but it does improve with practice. However I do believe some folks are better at keeping time than others. It's something that comes easy to some while others (like me) have to really work at it. For what it's worth, I find the more I "think" the worse it gets. relaxation is the key for me to stay in time. And practice.
Sorry for your loss. My thoughts and prayers are with you and your family
Thanks for the link SouthPaw. That is a simple well thought out resource
Elixir lights on my Takamine six string cutaway. Martin marquis medium on my Yahama acoustic. I love the Elixirs!!!!!!!
For practicing bar chords: I started with the standard shapes and then worked my way into the more complex ones. For example: start with F and B (you'll sometimes hear them referred to as the E and A shaped chords) and maybe B minor. When you master these 3 shapes you're well on your way.
F = 133211 B = 113331 B Minor = 113321. sliding these shapes down the fret board will give you many chords. ex: F slide up 2 gives you G slide up 2 more gives you A, etc.
There are many posts regarding this topic I highly recommend using the search feature to find and read them. People a lot more qualified then me have posted their wisdom.
The time (and finger pain) spent learning these shapes will pay off. If you want to be even a mediocre player you'll have to have bar chords under your belt. bar chords will make you a better musician and open up new ways of playing.
Keep at it.
John Lennon and Herbie Hancock...what would that sound like?
Takamine G series A/E with TK4 pick up. I've been very happy with mine for 2 years now.
I play very little with others which is unfortunate; I wish I had time for more. IMO, the bottom line is looping and the like are toys. Fun to play and practice and if it makes you play and practice more great. BUT I agree with Russell it IS NEVER a substitute for playing with other musicians. The human element can never be replaced. Improvisation, anticipation, collaboration...no machine substitute.
In my head:
Sabbath, Zeppelin and Deep Purple are hard rock, Metallica, Megadeth, etc are heavy metal. For me, the newer heavy metal stuff seems less blues based and "faster" . I'm not a huge fan of metal but there are certainly some artists that have integrity and a unique sound. Like any genre that becomes popular (as metal did here in the states in the 90's) there are less original copy cat bands that take it more towards pop like Poison, etc. IMO, these bands are alot less tolerable. They have talent but what they turn out does not reflect it. I often hear people refer to Sabbath and Zeppelin as the grandfathers of metal but I don't agree. They may have inspired some of it but the metal bands were unique (like it or hate it; it was different and different is good for the industry).
Just my 2 cents
Posts found: 801 to 825 of 1,061