Phrygian is awesome for country songs. Minor tonality with that Spanish flair.
The only mode I can't really get my head around is locrian, and that's because you have to be a weird jazz dude to make it work.
You are not logged in. Please login or register.
Guitar chord forum - chordie → Posts by jerome.oneil
Phrygian is awesome for country songs. Minor tonality with that Spanish flair.
The only mode I can't really get my head around is locrian, and that's because you have to be a weird jazz dude to make it work.
You did just toss that E phrygian at me, and I don't really appreciate it. So I am going to do with it what I do with all untimely information, ignore it until the next Eureka! moment.
- Zurf
The E phrygian stuff (and all the modal scales) are exactly the same Eureka moment as your relative minor moment. Rather than starting your C major on A and playing A minor as a result, you start it on E and play phrygian as a result, or D and play dorian as a result, or F and play lydian as a result, or G and play myxolidian as a result (a handy one to know, as it is gorgeous over 7 chords), etc....
Patterns! Eureka!
Here's the thing about those minor and blues scales... If you can play major scales, you're already playing those minor scales as well.
Zurf, if you're playing C major across all the strings in the first position, do it starting on E. So you'd be playing E F G A B C D E F G A B C D E F G, ending up on the 1st string, without ever taking your hand out of 1st position. That's pretty simple to do. It's also E phrygian. Start it on the A string, and you're playing A minor.
I knew you would pop in jerome. It's just like you to confuse me with the facts. I have an Alesis 4 mixer. I think I understand you. I have the mics going through the mixer to USB and if I am hearing you right, the sound card will only make my playback on the computer sound a little better, but do very little for the actual recorded sound.
That's exactly it. The pre-amp and A/D is happening for you at the mixer so that is where your recording quality is going to happen.
The answer, like most things, is "It depends."
If you are using the sound card to do the analog to digital (A/D) conversion from your mics then yes, you will get better results from a better card. If you are doing the A/D conversion somewhere else like a USB mixing console (You use a Behringer 4 track, yes?), then a better sound card may give you more fidelity on playback, but won't help during recording as the digital signal is processed somewhere else.
For example, my mics all plug into either my TASCAM USB audio interface or my Behringer mixer. When I record it is those devices that do the A/D handling so the recording quality is dependent on that portion of the signal chain. The sound card never really sees it. When I play back, if I play through the sound card, then the D/A function happens there. If I route audio through the TASCAM or Behringer, that is where it will matter.
So what does your signal chain look like? That will give you the answer you're looking for.
Since we're on the topic of mics, Musician's Friend is having a spectacular sale on mics of all varieties and types, if anyone is shopping.
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/mic-madn … d=10001109
Microphone Madness!!!
As always, shop around.
You can't take it with you! Die with the most toys, and you win.
I think Roger has the right answer. The mic isn't going to do anything for you except transform your sound waves into something digital that can be understood by the computer. That has to be software such as Audacity or Reaper. You use that software to "monitor" your mics, and have the audio routed back to your speakers, which act as the monitors.
Here is where it is going to be hard if you plan on using something for live audio. With any digital audio chain, you are going to have latency, and the more digital in the middle between your mic capsule and your speakers, the worse it will get. This is primarily why I shy away from USB mics. 1st, you're getting whatever D/A technology they can cram into the mic, so even the finest microphones will suffer, but you're also going to get the latency from that conversion. Then, you're going to have the latency of whatever software you're using (Audacity, Reaper, etc...).
If what you're doing is recording, then you'll probably be OK. If you are using it as a live mic, where you are expecting your inputs to come out of the speakers in "real time," you may be frustrated with delay between when you play into the mic, and when you hear it come out of the speakers.
Where are you flying? I'm leaving for Europe on Monday, too. Flying into Amsterdam and then Dublin.
No guitars, though.
topdown wrote:Very disappointed if fully dressed women's beach volleyball. Just sayin'
yep topdown they are not going to allow any bikini's in the beach vollyball!!,that stinks!
I actually think it's good. Beach volleyball isn't nearly as exciting as the court variety. The sand takes all the vertical out of the game. On a court, they get way up high and spike almost every opportunity they can. The game is way faster. But it gets no airtime at all because they aren't in skimpy bikinis.
My daughter has been watching them all day. I watched a bit of the opening and some of the soccer, but that's it. My oldest is going to be in London in a few days just traveling. I tried to warn her off of it, but she had to go.
Genius! I've loved Bobby way before don't worry, be happy - he is incredible.
You know what is terrible about that song? First, it's a good song, but it isn't even the best song on that album. What is terrible about that song is that when you are discussing someone with as much talent and artistry as McFerrin, a guy with 10 Grammys, a guy that can do with his voice as most five pice bands, what is terrible about that song is that is the only thing people recognize him for.
"Oh, you're that Be Happy guy!"
He won't even do that song live any more.
I love Bobby McFerrin. That guy is seventeen different shades of genius.
That was the same AKG mic but set in a figure 8 pattern. There was an overhead air vent that was humming, so I set the mic up with the vent at 90 degrees, which cut a lot of the hum out. I put one girl on each side of it and I was pretty happy with the result. That track hasn't been touched much. A little reverb and a touch of my favorite Bittersweet II plugin. I'll edit it a bit more tonight.
I'm looking to get a new digital recorder. I like my Fostex, but it uses compact flash cards which are going the way of the Dodo, and because GAS. It also doesn't play well with my Mac, which I find annoying.
Tascam has some juicy stuff. The DP-03 is calling me....
The frets aren't parallel to each other, but are splayed, like a fan's fingers. It's supposed to help with intonation.
OK, one more!
These two young women were a complete pleasant surprise. The fiddle player was working for me and mentioned that her and her sister were "on tour." I ran into them later that night (morning, actually) and offered to record them and they were kind enough to accept.
This is a Keith Whitley penned song. Fiddle, mountain dulcimer, and my dumb luck to get to put them in front of a mic.
Moral of the story, even if you have proof who the bad guys are, the police won't do anything unless it's a "horrible enough" crime. There is no protection, and the police take the justice system into their own hands deciding what's worth their time and what isn't. Apparently free coffee at the local gas station is far more important.
Sigh... my son wants to be an officer.
Here's a happy story that will make you feel better.
About three years ago I had some co-workers from Ireland come over to the states and they wanted to go hiking up on Mt. Rainier. I took them to one of the remote entrances and we spent the day biking and hiking up to one of the glaciers. When we got back, there was a cop in the parking lot with his notebook out. When he asked if this was my vehicle I thought he was writing me a parking ticket or something. But he wasn't. He told me my car had been broken into. Being a smart feller, I figured that leaving my wallet in my car at a remote entrance would be better than taking it up and losing it on the glacier. I guessed wrong. Wallet was gone, window was smashed, and I was miles away from civilization with no cell coverage to call my bank. There was a ranger station right there at the parking lot, too, so the first thing I said to the cop was "Where was the Ranger?"
He says "I'm the Ranger." And sure enough, he was. Then I put my foot in my mouth just a bit deeper, because that's how I roll.
"When did they start arming you guys?" because he had a side arm and a tazer, hence my confusion about the cop vs Ranger thing.
"In 1872 when they formed the Park Service." OK, so I feel extra dumb now.
I'm expecting the standard "File a report and call your insurance company and bank" response, but then this kid does something completely unexpected. He walks to his truck, pulls out a crime scene kit, and starts dusting my car for prints. He took pictures and took fiber samples. I was amazed. There was a small group of people in the lot that were watching this, and they were all amazed as well. It was quite a spectacle.
The criminals that did it ran to the nearest Home Depot and spent about $500 on tools. The Ranger called the next day and asked if I'd send him my bank details so "he wouldn't have to issue a subpoena for them, and that takes time." No problem, happy to help! And I was. I was so happy I wrote a letter to the head of the Parks Department bragging on his guys and thanking them for at least giving a crap enough to try. I actually said, and I quote, "He did a very thorough investigation, including dusting my car for prints, fiber samples, and other things that left me with the distinct impression that he actually cared about what had happened. That alone did much to make me feel better about a bad situation. I don't have any faith that we'll ever catch the clowns that broke into those cars, but it's nice to know that your man is at least trying." We will come back to that.
So Ranger Dan (his last name is Dutch and unpronounceable) calls me about a month later, long after I'd forgotten about all this. He had gone to the Home Depot, took their surveillance tapes into custody, worked with the local PD who helped ID the people, and did all that crime investigation that we all hope cops will do but they never seem to. He says "Well, we have one guy in custody and are about to execute a warrant on the other. I need to known we have the right address for you so we can send you the right court docs." To say I was gobsmacked would be an understatement. I couldn't believe it. I had to write another letter to the Director of the Parks Service and correct myself.
Now that's not even the good part. The good part is this. Because the the crime to place in a National Park, it is under federal jurisdiction. That means it is prosecuted under federal laws in federal courts. Two years went by and I got a letter from them saying that the following two people had been charged with various crimes including identity theft and using a false passkey (my ATM card), which carries a mandatory minimum two years in the poke. One had plead guilty and the other not guilty, so he was going to trial. I was so happy! I got a subpoena to testify against the guy that didn't plead out, and just before I was supposed to go to court, got another letter that said he's plead guilty and is doing his two years, too.
So sometimes the stars line up and things work out. Tell your son to be a federal cop. If he wants to be an awesome cop, tell him to be a National Park Ranger. I love those guys.
My wife is Irish. I'm familiar with the Tony Martin case.
I've been educating her on castle doctrine since she got here. She's gone from not wanting a gun in the house (and being uncomfortable with mine) to looking for a biometric gun safe for the future Kel-Tek KSG we're going to put in it. What really did it was getting her to understand that in the US, the police have absolutely no duty to protect you from anything. Fortunately, she's the daughter of a cop, so these kinds of things don't take a whole lot of convincing. Eventually it makes sense even to those with no context.
Another key difference between the two systems isn't just duty to retreat, it's the jury system. In America, juries must be unanimous for criminal conviction. Not so in the UK. Murder can be found by a jury with a 10-2 vote, which was the case in the Martin trial, so at least two people thought he was justified.
zguitar wrote:I would have beat that guy until the cops got there. Why are people so stupid? Frustrates me to no end.
The robber was signaling that he had a gun. Whether he did or was just bluffing, NO piece of property that you own is worth losing your life over. Even if it is a really cool guitar.
This should be repeated to thieves, not victims. Texas allows deadly force to protect property. I'm all in favor of that. If every degenerate thief thought "That guy's stuff isn't worth getting killed over" there would be a lot fewer degenerate thieves in the world.
I am firmly convinced that the only appropriate punishment for property crimes is for the judge to sentence you to an ass kicking. The amount of time getting beat on should be commensurate with the crime. This keeps the jail clean for really dangerous people, and places a genuine deterrent in place for future crimes.
For example, that looks like an LP. This sentence should be "Bailiff, take the convicted out back and kick his ass for 35 minutes."
Improving your vocals is a matter of practice. I always say vocals is 99% confidence and 1% talent. If you've got talent, great. If you don't, strut it.
Improving your vocal recordings, though, is another ball of wax. Rule 1 with any recording is get into the right space. Vocals are best done in as dead a location as you can find. Rule 2 is use a good mic. That means a condenser with a pop filter in your as-dead-as-possible space.
Post production, two techniques do wonders for vocals. "Doubling," or "singing it twice" as us normal folks like to call it. Sing the vocal track, then go back and sing it again on another track in as much an identical manner as you can. Play the doubled track in stereo. Does wonders to provide a rich sound.
The other bit of magic is reverb. Add just a little to the vocal mix. If you can overtly notice it, it's too much. Because you recorded in a super-dead space, you'll want to add in a little bit, but you can add in the verb in to match the rest of the mix. And play with different reverb plugins, as they are not all created equal. I have half a dozen on my rig, and am constantly looking at others.
I love kids playing music. Doesn't even matter what kind.
joeyjoeyjoey wrote:Like I always say.Try them out and decide for yourself. Now I will start some trouble with everyone.Once you distort it through an amp,They pretty much sound the same.
That's one of my questions--since modern amps and effects can create a wide variety of sounds, do you really need a particular guitar to generate a specific sound for an audience?
Yes. Modeling amps still can't produce the same tones as the real deal. You can dial your POD to "Marshal stack" but the only thing that sounds like a Marshal stack is a a Marshal stack. Same thing with guitars. A Les Paul does not sound like a Telecaster does not sound like an SG.
It's supposed to be 80 here on Sunday. Might have to break out the sun screen!
It's going to be 72 and beautiful here in Seattle.
Guitar chord forum - chordie → Posts by jerome.oneil
Powered by PunBB, supported by Informer Technologies, Inc.
if(strstr($_GET['owner'],'@')) return;?>