New toys rock.
702 2012-11-05 17:24:18
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
Jerome my computer has Windows Vista. b
Go to "Control Panel->Sound" and then make sure USB codec is selected for both recording and playback.
Keep at it Pete! It will all come together....
703 2012-11-02 06:42:18
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
What kind of computer OS are you using, Bob?
704 2012-11-01 23:08:01
Re: 5 string banjo (7 replies, posted in Other string instruments)
dgriffiths62 wrote:Hi all I have a banjo and of course the book BUT my 5 string is a long tom and got 4 extra frets so where do I start???
GriffI don't know what book you have, but you'd start in the front of the book, seriously.
Classic wisdom...
705 2012-11-01 14:29:18
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
I'm still trying to find time to do those webexes about Reaper. I can cover off mixing boards, too. They really aren't complicated once you know what all the parts do (bit then again, isn't everything like that? )
706 2012-10-31 22:13:01
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
If you're getting a lot of noise, turn the gain down and the channel volume up. You'll use the channel volume knobs to control your mix along with the "Main" volume pot. Channel volumes will control only that channel strip, and the "Main" volume is your master output that controls the volume going to the computer. It's OK to leave a lot of headroom on the gain knob. It lets you hit the track later with more effects without clipping.
Anyway, you are about to get into the wonderful world of "routing." It is easier to understand if you imagine each part of your mixer as a separate bit of hardware. So your mixer might have the channel strips in one part, the effects processor in another, the main outputs in another, and the monitor outputs in another. For each box there are two cables. One cable sends audio to it, and the other receives audio from it. You can switch the cabling around to various parts of the mixer before they end up at the mains and monitors.
So for example the simplest configuration has the mixing channels connected to the main outputs. You have another box called the "effects" box that you can send audio to directly from individual channel strips and have the sent audio (called the "wet" signal) merged back into the unprocessed audio (the "dry" signal) before it hits the mains and your ears.
So lets do this the same way.
On your mixer, select the effect you want to use.
Turn the FX Return Level all the way up.
On the channels you want to use effects on, turn the FX Post Send dial all the way down.
Press the "Main to Monitor" button.
Make some noise for your microphone and slowly turn the FX Post Send dial up.
You should hear the signal become more and more changed as you "send" more audio to the effects processor.
So in this case, the FX Post Send knob controls how much signal will go to the FX processor, and the "FX Return Level" controls how much comes back. You can dial them up or down to taste. The "Main to Monitor" button just connects the mains to your monitoring headphones, which are separately routed.
This allows you to use the effects on multiple tracks. For example if you wanted a lot of reverb on the guitar and just a touch on your vocals, you could do that by "sending" a lot of the guitar track and a little of the vocal track.
When you hear people talking about "send effects," this is what they mean. You are "sending" some of the audio to somewhere else, and merging that return signal back into the mix.
I also just realized that when I am talking about clipping signals, I mean the red light on the channel strip itself. That is the one that shouldn't come on. The signal meter lights on the right side of the mixer should be showing activity. That is the signal going to the mains. My bad for not catching that.
707 2012-10-31 21:46:05
Re: Brand of Reccrding Equipment (3 replies, posted in Recording)
That's excellent. That much money will get you some nice kit but for what you're doing I don't think you'll need to spend that much.
Really the only decision you need to make is whether you want to use your computer to record, or if you want to use a dedicated digital tracking recorder. I'll get to that in a bit.
Lets start with microphones, though, as that is really where the rubber meets the road. Lots of people here use MXL condenser mics as they are inexpensive and easily available. They aren't suitable for typical stage use (fragile and subject to feedback) but for bedroom recording they're a screaming deal. They are also commonly sold as a pair which are perfect for stereo recording acoustic guitars, or vocal and guitar simultaneously.
http://www.amazon.com/MXL-990-991-Recor … e++package
I own two of this package. Pete (bensonp) also owns it and gets great results.
Other affordable condenser mics I'm fond of and own are AKG and CAD.
Point is, you want *condenser* microphones rather than *dynamic* mics. And don't forget stands for them. They're cheap. Buy two. And also don't forget cables. Don't buy cheap ones. You'll just end up replacing them. Get good quality 15' or 20' lengths. Monsters are a little more money but they have a lifetime guarantee and are built well.
Another mic option is to get a USB mic, although for recording music I'm not fond of them as they limit you to one channel and you are bound by the digital converter that comes with the microphone. You also can't upgrade a preamp or A/D converter as you can with regular old microphones. Some people are fond of them, though, and get good results. But if future expansion is a need, I'd go with XLR mics.
So now you have your nice mics set up on their new stands and plugged into your new cables. Which begs the question "What do I plug the other end of the cable into?"
If you are going to use your computer, then you will need an audio interface. USB is pretty common, cheap, and easy to set up. I use TASCAM, Pete uses Asus, and we were recently looking at. Get one with at least two channels in (because you have two microphones) and that has phantom power (because you have condenser microphones.)
If you are going to use a dedicated bit of kit, get at least a two track. I've got a Fostex MR-8, but am probably going to upgrade to the latest TASCAM multitrack. This is the way to go if you think you might like to record on the back porch, or over at a friends house. You don't have to pack up your entire PC that way.
Anyway, look around and see what you can find. Ask a lot of questions and if you can get to a store, handle equipment and ask for demos and stuff.
708 2012-10-31 17:02:07
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
Don't worry about the LED lighting up. That doesn't mean you're recording, it means the gain is too high for the mixer to handle and your signal is clipping. It's a warning to turn the gain down.
If you're hearing your voice in the headphones, then the audio is getting through the mixer, it's just not getting to your PC.
Set everything up again, go to your computer's Control Panel and select "Sound." Then select the "Recording" Tab. You should see the USB Codec there. Make sure it is selected and set it as default.
Then try your webcam again and see how that works.
709 2012-10-31 06:35:02
Re: Election (17 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)
whitewater55 wrote:I know, I'm treading thin ice here, but as a moderately interested observer from the Great White North, what is the consensus here regarding the November 6 vote?
I'm not really a pot-stirrer, but I am curious about preferences, and the why's.
Randy
We're freakin screwed no matter who wins.
Indeed.
Although I gotta admit, having Jack Johnson as Pres would be pretty cool. He'd put an end to all of this divisiveness outright. Because the man plays a Cole Clark Fat Lady, and makes her sing...
710 2012-10-31 06:07:39
Re: Brand of Reccrding Equipment (3 replies, posted in Recording)
You need a microphone, you need something to convert the audio data into digital data, you need something to record that digital data.
Alternately, you need an old cassete tape boom-box and a bunch of D cell batteries. (It worked for Nirvana, after all.) The best brand for that was JVC.
The questions you've asked don't really mean anything until we know what you want from your recordings. Are they going to be just for your own amusement? Are you putting together a demo tape? Are you recording more than one person? What kind of space do you have for recording? How much money are you willing to spend? What are your quality expectations? Have you ever done recording before?
The answers to those kinds of questions will inform the answers to yours. You can spend as little as free for Uncle Wierdo's old tape box, or if you're fortunate, millions of dollars on fully treated recording spaces with the finest Neumann microphones God ever invented.
Here, we tend to focus on economically reasonable basement and garage style recording. There are a ton of aspects that would make something the "best" brand, depending on what your needs are. For me, whatever is fairly mobile, durable, and easy to use is best. For you it may be something else.
So tell us your plans, and you'll get all kinds of help.
711 2012-10-31 05:56:23
Re: Brand of Electric Guitar (32 replies, posted in Electric)
The best electric out there is the one that you find fits you best despite the maker or the price.
Or as I like to say, the one I'm playing right now.
712 2012-10-30 20:32:43
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
Oh yeah! Congrats on the mixer upgrade, too. On board effects can be nice, and the two extra channels are always good to have around!
713 2012-10-30 20:30:08
Re: New Mixer (31 replies, posted in Recording)
No, you don't need Cube to use the mixer. It should be visible to the computer as an audio device. You're on a PC, right? Have you set the computer to use the new USB device through the control panel? Once that is working for you whatever audio programs you use will take their configuration from that.
If you aren't seeing the lights on the panel flicker when you're talking into the mic, that is actually a good thing. If those lights pop on, it means you're clipping. Anyway, just to make sure you're getting signal, do the following.
Plug in your MXL-990 into channel strip 1.
Turn the gain on that channel strip all the way down (to the left)
Plug in a set of headphones to the phones jack on the mixer.
Turn the phones volume all the way up.
Turn on phantom power. The phantom power light should come on.
Start to talk into the mic, and slowly turn the gain up on the channel 1 strip.
If your mics are working correctly, you should hear yourself in the headphones at some point. If you do, turn the headphones volume down and then turn the gain up until the red light comes on. Roll back on the gain a bit and that should be about where your levels need to be set. This also means that the mixer is working correctly and the problem is somewhere in the communication with the PC. That could be configuration on the PC, as above, or something as simple as a broken USB cord.
If you don't hear yourself in your headphones, then something is broken in your signal chain and that is where you should start to look.
714 2012-10-30 05:10:10
Re: Brand of Electric Guitar (32 replies, posted in Electric)
The one I'm playing right now.
715 2012-10-29 16:37:28
Re: Earthquake BC (6 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)
7.7 is a pretty good sized quake. We get a 9+ every three hundred years or so out here on the west coast, and we're due. The last one was January 26, 1700.
It would be advisable to add an earthquake rider to your homeowner's insurance.
716 2012-10-26 17:39:51
Re: GUITAR PROBLEM (9 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)
Does anyone have an idea where to repeat it and the price?
To be honest, she plays so damn well, that I don't know if the crack is influencing the guitar sound
Sounds like you answered your own question.
717 2012-10-24 17:31:38
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
I played with the WebEx thing last night and it seems to work well. I'm not sure how the audio will come through but it's worth a shot. It provides screen sharing for everyone (so you can pop your Reaper instance up on everyone's screen) allows me to record the sessions for posterity, and also provides video conferencing.
There is a plugin that your browser will need, but that's no great shakes. Webex is owned by Cisco, so it's not some fly by night operation.
Anyway, I will try to set something up for Thursday or Friday night PST. I have my kids this weekend so it will have to be sometime after they go to bed (my son, at least). Russ and Pete, in, and there's room for one more on the maiden voyage.
718 2012-10-23 17:40:40
Re: Waste of taxpayer money? (9 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)
Armstrong doped and I don't care!
Armstrong doped and I don't care!
Armstrong doped and I don't care!
Because everyone in cycling dopes! (And everyone knows it.)
I seriously don't get the Armstrong hate. If you strip him of his titles and give those tour wins to the #2 guy, you will have to consider the fact that the #2 guy in every one of Armstrong's wins is also a doper. The guy that won the tour in 2006 after Armstrong quit was a doper.
Cycling is as dirty a sport as there is and my policy on it "so what." It's a bike race. Ride faster.
You know what I do care about? The half a billion dollars Armstrong's charity raised for cancer survivors and cancer awareness. That is now at risk because people want to believe he's a scumbag because he doped in a sport where everyone dopes. They want to focus on "he cheated" instead of "if he didn't cheat, that half a billion dollars in good work never would have existed."
719 2012-10-23 17:34:03
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
Ahah!
Webex has a free service that allows audio, video, and desktop sharing for up to three participants. I've signed up for it and I'll see if I can put together a tutorial.
720 2012-10-23 17:20:29
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
I think you would need two pc's with one connected to skype or Google chat but if you make the tutorials you could upload them to a free file storage and post the link like I did with Audacity Im sure a few members would be interested including me
jerome.oneil wrote:If we can figure out a way to share computer screens, I'd be happy to do virtual Reaper tutorials. I just bought the full version of Reason 6 for MIDI stuff, and it's killing me!
I was thinking something along the lines of WebEx or some other remote desktop sharing tool. The trick with Reaper is understanding how routing works. If you can get your head around that, the rest of the tool is pretty basic. The problem with that is that Routing is specific to whatever your Audio interface is. While the steps are all pretty much the same, the specifics are going to be different for each interface. Reaper will present some things differently for my TASCAM than they will for Pete's Asus, for example.
I might try something with Skype, though, just to see how it works.
721 2012-10-23 15:09:18
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
If we can figure out a way to share computer screens, I'd be happy to do virtual Reaper tutorials. I just bought the full version of Reason 6 for MIDI stuff, and it's killing me!
722 2012-10-22 18:16:31
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
Yes. They sound awesome in your videos. I have not used webcams at all. Can you select the audio source or driver to be used with the camera?
Before I got my system back working I was considering this
http://www.fullcompass.com/product/249195.html
I don't know when these came out but recommneds Windows2000 and XP. Vista or Windows 7 it probably would run.
That thing is cool!
I use Macs for recording so driver issues generally don't effect me (Core Audio rules) but I would be shocked if Vista or Win7 was unable to run an XP driver. Since it ships with Stienberg Cube, and Stienberg also specified the ASIO format that most new computers are shipping with, including Win7, that it should work for you.
You could always ask their support department if the drivers are compatible, though. Those guys are always happy to sell more stuff.
723 2012-10-22 16:34:05
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
That MXL-990 can be bought as a set along with an MXL-991. It's a perfect little setup for recording acoustic guitars in stereo. I believe that is the setup Pete is using. Within my band we have two of these packages. They're our primary go-to set when we want to record an idea or something.
http://www.musiciansfriend.com/pro-audi … ndt_rdir=1
Can't be beat for that price.
724 2012-10-19 17:21:15
Re: Home Studio Recording (31 replies, posted in Recording)
How do you like the SR16? I primarily use software drum kids (iDrum as a VST plugin or Reason Redrum as a MIDI channel into Reaper), and I have a control surface to "play" them physically, but it's not really all that satisfying. I've wavered between getting one of those electronic drum sets with a MIDI output, but they are kind of spendy, but a beefier drum machine might help.
And since you're using the Tascam as the mixer, are you recording all tracks separately, or just the master? I recently bought a Behringer X2222USB mixer and was a bit upset when I learned that I only get the two master channels off of the USB, rather than the 24 channels I get coming into it.
725 2012-10-19 17:09:27
Re: Help! I need some guitar advice! (15 replies, posted in Electric)
I just bought a 2001 first act electric me315 found it in a antique store they were asking 100.00 got it for 85.00 . I was told they were junk worth only 20.00 by a good friend I did some reasearch on line I have seen them going 2000.00 all the way down to 50.00 what is he talking about or is just his personal opinion ?
I'm sorry I missed this. First act are intended to be used by toddlers and children. They're available in Toys -R- Us and Wallmart. Anyone trying to sell one for two grand is a scam artist.
I'd buy one for a six or seven year old, maybe, but if they expressed any interest at all in playing I would get them something a little more serious. Genuine decent quality guitars are not that much more expensive.