551

(12 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Country Roads is probably the best closet punk song ever written.    John D was awesome.

552

(28 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

What's the over/under on how much Eagles tickets are going to cost?  I'm going to guess $300 for something not in the nose-bleed seats.

553

(10 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

I wouldn't pay $700 to watch Jesus raise the dead.  Prince just played here at a small venue (the Showbox Theater) and was getting $250 at ticket.  Still too much, even for that kind of show.

554

(8 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Lets give them some time to find out what really happened before we start complaining about it.  The media will always get it wrong, because they will report every rumor, Tweet, and whisper they hear as news.  So stop watching it.   It serves no purpose, other than entertainment.

The cops (Boston PD, Massachusetts State Police, and all 13(?) Federal policing agencies) are going to take a good long time to sift through this thing, and they should.  It is a great big complicated mess with international implications.  I would imagine congressional investigations on both sides of the congress, too, once the facts start coming out.  They have a live bad guy, a whole lot of evidence and investigating to do.   So be patient.   They'll figure it out in the end.

555

(3 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Of all the folk traditions, I think the Irish are the most entertaining, that's for sure.  There are drinking songs,  "I'm about to get hung" songs, "My woman left me" songs, and more drinking songs.

We are working up a rendition of Seven Drunken Nights right now.

As I came home on a Monday night, as drunk as drunk could beeeee!

556

(10 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Roger Guppy wrote:

I would go into the local music stores and try the ones that were in my price range. The name on it means nothing as one for you will just feel and sound absolutely right.

Roger

That up there, what Roger said, is exactly the right thing.   Go play a bunch you can afford.  One of 'em will tell you her name.

557

(34 replies, posted in Recording)

I think so.  I took out ReaVerb  last night and replaced it with the TAL-Reverb.  The effect is much more subtle, and I don't feel like I lost the direct sound in all the echoes.   

I'd still rather have a giant awesome room, but in a pinch... big_smile

As far as install goes, Mac installs all audio plugins, regardless of type (VST, AU Component, etc...) in one spot so I just drag the VST directory to there and I'm done.   When you install it on Windows, keep note of where the installer puts it on your hard drive, and then do the same exercise we did last night with the VST Preferences by adding that path to the VST directories.    I'm assuming you know what *not* to do.  ;-)

You might also want to check out Voxengo SPAN.  It's a spectrum analyzer but it is a whole lot more useful because it allows you to set up A/B testing between two different setups, and the actual display on the analyzer is a whole lot easier to read.   And also, free.

http://www.voxengo.com/product/span/

558

(34 replies, posted in Recording)

Some awesome VST plugins for the low low cost of nuthin right here from TAL.

http://kunz.corrupt.ch/Products

I am not a big fan of digital reverb, but the gentle 'verb coming out of the TAL-Reverb box is as nice as I've found.

559

(10 replies, posted in Recording)

Russell and I did a bit of an impromptu dry run this morning, and it seemed to work well.

560

(5 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Honestly I can't believe they're still going.  I saw their reunion tour with all four original members in *1998.*   It was a good show, but my comments leaving were "They're still pretty spry for a bunch of geriatrics."

They're going to need to wheel them on stage these days.

561

(10 replies, posted in Recording)

That's a fact.  They've got it now, putting a new disk in it, and I should have it back around Wednesday or Thursday.  I'm also getting the OS upgraded to the latest and greatest.

562

(10 replies, posted in Recording)

Well, in classic "timing is everything" fashion, my Mac has decided that now is the time for the hard drive to fail, so I'm out of commission for the near future.  I'm trying to get the thing repaired tomorrow, and my wife says I can have her mac book pro (God bless her) so I'll see what I can manage.

563

(44 replies, posted in Recording)

It took me a while to figure out that the master fader was not the volume control, too.  big_smile

564

(4 replies, posted in Other string instruments)

Learn scales.   Learn where the I and the V are for whatever key you're playing in.   If you can do that, you can play bass.

565

(44 replies, posted in Recording)

I just got a new bass amp, so I may have to wait a bit before I can get one of these things.  Which makes me sad.

But it was an SVT-4 + Cab for $650.  Can't pass that up!

I'm living vicariously through you now, Russell!

566

(10 replies, posted in Recording)

There has been some renewed interest in doing video session on how to use Reaper to record, edit, and mix music.   Given the success of the Skype Jams, I think that could be successful.   I've set up a Google+ group for anyone interested in learning to use Reaper, and as soon as I have a bit of time to put together a basic presentation, I'll send out invitations and schedules for those sessions.

The group is here:  https://plus.google.com/communities/117 … 3953876761

You'll need to be a member of Google+, and I'm pretty sure you can do that using your own email address, google or not.

I think the first session will be focused on setting up Reaper, understanding the basic workflows, and audio routing, with the goal of being able to record or import some audio, play it back, and bounce it to disk.

567

(21 replies, posted in Recording)

OK.  I've set up a Reaper focused group on Google+ that will allow anyone interested in Reaper to join.  It should make setting up the video sessions on using Reaper a whole lot easier to manage, as I can just communicate the schedules to the group as a whole.

Anyone interested the link is here...

https://plus.google.com/communities/117 … 3953876761

Once you're signed in and joined, I'll approve the thing and then start setting up the sessions.   I'll also create a separate thread with this information in it in case people not interested in our collective genius are interested.  smile

568

(14 replies, posted in Recording)

Of the Behringers, get the USB one so you can use it for an audio interface, too.

569

(14 replies, posted in Recording)

You'll want a powered mixer so you can provide phantom power to your mics.   I have a thing for Tascam, but others here have had great success with other brands.

http://www.sweetwater.com/store/compare … |US122mk2)

Those two + some recording software and a couple of condenser mics are plenty enough to get you started, though.

570

(21 replies, posted in Recording)

beamer wrote:

All I have to do is reload reaper also.  Personal request, seeing as how I work nights, when your doing the lessons, is it possible to record them like a yt vid?  Ill be out playing on my bike all this weekend also.

Of course.  In fact, since I'm gloriously unemployed at the moment, I can stay up late and use you as my guinea pig.  big_smile

What hours do you work?

571

(21 replies, posted in Recording)

I'd still be happy to do that, although I think I might use Google Hangout or WebEX.  In fact, I'll set something up this week, seeing as how I got nuthin better to do.  big_smile

572

(21 replies, posted in Recording)

Reaper is very track focused.  If you were looking under the file menu, all of those options are dedicated to the files created from your project.     There are a number of ways to import external audio, though.  The easiest is to just drag the audio file from your computer into the Reaper track panel.  Reaper will create a new track for you and insert the audio.    You can also use the Import->Media File menu.  Or the media explorer.   smile

I know you guys are comfortable with Audacity, but it is a toy, and I mean that in the nicest possible way.   There is nothing it can do that Reaper can't, and there are about a thousand things Reaper can do that it can't, and it does everything better.   Reaper is a professional audio tool on par with ProTools.   It is more complex than Audacity simply because it does way more that Audacity.   Russ, for someone doing the quality of work you are doing, I honestly believe it is holding you back.    Even if you don't like Reaper, there are literally dozens of better options out there.  Logic, CubeBase, Cakewalk....  They can all do live VST, native MIDI sequencing, non-destructive punch-in/out, everything that you would expect in a professional workstation is out there.   From a feature and quality standpoint, Audacity is at the bottom of the list in almost every way.   You have exceeded the level of your tools, man!  Upgrade!  The learning curve isn't that steep, but it is well worth it when you're done.

573

(14 replies, posted in Recording)

Blue Icicle isn't a mic.  It's an XLR to USB converter.  Russell is entirely correct about needing a mixer and decent mics to do this.   So get two decent mics and the ability to mix.   You can mix in hardware or software.  Doesn't matter.   I won't go into detail on that.   Ask around here, you'll get tons of good advice on affordable kit.  I'll talk about the recording process here, and assume you know how to use your kit.

You should be able to record at least two tracks at the same time.  Whether that is Reaper or Audiacity or a hardware workstation is irrelevant (although you can do more with Reaper).  The DP-25 Russ recommends is awesome (and I'm getting one) but you can spend a lot less and get a quality USB interface from a variety of vendors for a lot less money and just record directly to your computer.   Look at the Tascam US-800, for example.

Anyway, here are your recording steps.

Step 0.  WRT the space, unless you have access to an acoustically treated room, do as much as you can to deaden the room you are in.   Make a single strike on the snare and listen for flutter echoes.  Do everything you can to eliminate them.   Stuff big fluffy furniture in the corners to help reduce standing waves.   If you are in your house and have a selection of rooms, pick the biggest one that isn't square.  Square is evil.  The room you record in will have a larger effect on the finished product than any other aspect of the process.   Get to know it.   Get to know how to treat it.   Get to know what different rooms do to sound.   It's the best thing you can do to improve your recordings.

Step 1.  Record a scratch track.  This is what you've already done.   A single mic recording everyone at once.  It will probably sound like crap, and that's OK.  So long as you can play along with it, that is all that matters.

Step 2.  Put the drummer on a pair of headphones, play the scratch track through the headphones, and have your drummer play along.  Record the drums as he plays.  You can do this with two mics for a good balance between quality and easy set up.  I like the "Recorderman method" as it eliminates phase problems that can happen with overhead techniques, and it is also easy to set up in a small space.     There are a ton of other one, two, three, and multiple mic techniques out there, though.  Pick one that works for you, *learn it,* and then use it.

Step 3.  Plug the bass directly into the recorder.  This is called Direct In, or just "DI" for short.   Put the bass player on the headphones and play the scratch track back for him.  Have him play along and record that.   This can be done simultaneously with the drums if you can record that many simultaneous tracks.   If the bass player has a specific sound that he likes out of his amp, don't sweat it.  We can come back and record that later using the track he just laid down.

Step 4.  Mic up your guitar amp.  Put the scratch track on the guitar player's head, and have him play along with the scratch track.   Record that.  Repeat as necessary for all guitars.

Step 5.  Record the vocals.  At this point, you shouldn't nee the scratch track as you have a full accompaniment of instruments.

Step 6, if your bass player has an amp tone he likes:  Take the bass track he recorded, and run it directly to the bass amp.     Mic up the bass amp.   Play the bass track through the amp, then record the amp.   Use that track in your mix.

Step 7.  Mix that thing down.

This kind of layered recording is time consuming, as you'll play each song at least three times, and probably more, but it gives you great sounds (no bleed, no phasing, etc...) and allows you to mix down into stereo easily.

574

(37 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

bensonp wrote:

If all else fails, drink a lot of alcohol before you sing and you will sound great.

Which genius here gave me my all time favorite quote?

"The more you drink, the better I sound?"

Anyway, I firmly believe that singing is 99% confidence, and 1% talent.  Sing it like you mean it, and people will listen.

575

(4 replies, posted in Songwriting)

jets60 wrote:

Hey Jerome,

Nice blues tune. I adjusted the chorus (soc & eoc) so they would line them up correctly.

Much appreciated.  I wasn't sure why that didn't format correctly, and after a few minutes of half-hearted trying, I lost interest.   smile