26

(7 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

geoaguiar wrote:

I developed a really bad posture from playing on the sofa for years. That's great that you're thinking about it now. It's too late for me. I play best on a stool (with foot rests) or a sofa/chair; standing with a strap, I'm not nearly as good but I'm working on it!!!

Come on brother, it's NEVER too late!  I was learning to play on my sofa also for the first 2 months or so.  Luckily wifey scolded me and for once it was worth while.  Sitting properly changed the angles of my wrist and fingers and that set me back a while but eventually I adjusted.  I used a strap before, maybe I'll try it again.  But I found that I got lazy with it and slouched more.  I ended up taking off because without it I sat more upright.

27

(7 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

Here’s a goofy question.  I’m teaching myself to play so I try to be wary of some of the things I may be doing wrong that will cause me problems down the road.  So I’m working on posture etc.  I got a piece of advice on playing with my guitar on my left knee.  That worked great because it raised the neck a bit, flattened my left wrist and badda-bing I could do an F chord and could Barre down the fret board.  BUT, I’m just sitting on a kitchen chair.  It feels low, I have no place to put my foot to lift it, and I end up slouching back in the chair.  I usually see musicians sitting on stools but in checking Musician’s Friend I see some are 24† some are 30†, some swivel, I don’t see any that go up and down.  Any recommendations, types. brands, where to buy, etc.?  Thanks!

28

(14 replies, posted in Acoustic)

topdown wrote:
Ranger1964 wrote:

Excellent!  Thanks.  Does he or anyboby else have videos on flat picking?  Dumb question, what's the difference.

Ranger - the difference between flatpicking and fingerpicking, in flatpicking you actually use a pick, finger picking - fingers only. Some also use a hybrid method - but I don't even want to think about that yet! smile

Check this guys vids - he shows some examples of both

http://www.youtube.com/user/Fretkillr

He's great!  I watched Mr. Bojangles and I guess flat picking songs is what I'm envisioning.  But I watched some finger picking videos and I'd like to do that also! 

So, what's next? Should I expand my chord selection, work on finger picking, flat picking, or the dreaded ALL OF THE ABOVE!

29

(14 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Guitarpix wrote:
Ranger1964 wrote:

Yup, born in 1964.  To be honest, I don't know how to begin learning finger picking so I'm looking for advice in that area too.  I have a feeling that to take the "next step" I'm going to have to parctice some things that are less "fun" than playing songs and I'm willing to do that especially now that I can always play a few sad country songs for fun.  I'm just curious what conventional wisdom, and more importantly experience has taught some of our compadres here.

Hey Ranger, This vids a good place to start on fingerpicking..IMO http://www.5min.com/Video/How-to-Play-G … -1-2459701  Here's a good song to practice the pattern with http://www.chordie.com/chord.pere/?url= … ranspose=0  At least it's were I started on fingerpicking... Hope it's helpfull! Peace!

Excellent!  Thanks.  Does he or anyboby else have videos on flat picking?  Dumb question, what's the difference.

30

(14 replies, posted in Acoustic)

I guess I'm not surprised that a teacher (read conventional wisdom) is using a broad brush approach.  A little of everything.  I'm wondering if others think this is the way to go, or has experience taught them that it's better to concentrate on one discipline prior to another? 

I agree that it may be time for me to take some lessons, BUT, I'm just a big enough of a  bull-head that if I got good consistent advice as to which way is preferable, I would insist that a teacher teach me that way or I'd find one that would.  BTW-the most common complaint that I've heard about teachers is that many are good players but have a tendency to meander around and pay little attention to how individual students learn.  Certainly not all teachers are that way, but if I knew WHAT I wanted to learn, I think I would have pretty good luck keeping the teacher on point. 

I just don't know which point(s) I should be focusing on.

31

(14 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Yup, born in 1964.  To be honest, I don't know how to begin learning finger picking so I'm looking for advice in that area too.  I have a feeling that to take the "next step" I'm going to have to parctice some things that are less "fun" than playing songs and I'm willing to do that especially now that I can always play a few sad country songs for fun.  I'm just curious what conventional wisdom, and more importantly experience has taught some of our compadres here.

32

(14 replies, posted in Acoustic)

As some of you may know I recently went through a quest for a new guitar that ended with my Taylor 810ce (woohoo, yeah me)!  But, now it’s time to get back to learning guitar instead of learning ABOUT guitars.

So, I know my CAGED chords, Em, Am, E7, A7, etc (the easy ones),  I’m working on F and can do it SLOWLY, but that’s a start.  I have 20 - 25 songs that I can play, some pretty good but most have “one little spot† that’s tough.  I can play the song and sing at the same time (harder than it sounds at first!) and I really don’t have to look at the fret board when playing those chords.  So for only playing a few months, that’s pretty good I think.

Soooooo, where do I go next?  My practice for the last 2 months has just been songs, songs, songs.  That has helped a lot but:

1)    Should I keep on with the same songs and add some more until I’m really really good with the CAGED chords and songs?
2)    Should I continue with the F chord and then start with the Barre chords and then learn lots of new songs until I’m really really good with those
3)    Should I start to learn to finger pick the CAGED chords?
4)    Should I be practicing scales?

My goal is to play “songs† not lead guitar.  I would like to know the chords to the point where my song options are NOT limited by the chords that I “can play†.  I want to be able to finger pick songs because now I’m playing songs by strumming that I know should be played finger picked (oh yeah or flat picked what’s the difference?).  Finally I want to be able to play some of the recognizable riffs as intros, outros and breaks in the songs I’m strumming.

So I know many of you have taken lessons, some have given lessons and all have opinions to express and stories to tell!   What’s next for me?

33

(16 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Wish You Were Here-Pink Floyd

These are easy chords with nicely spaced chord changes (which I found to be VERY VERY importaant when first starting.  For example, a lot of the Eagles songs are easy chords but are pretty quick changes.) Plus W.Y.W.H.  has that cool riff in the begining.  Don't worry about being exact on the riff, just play it a couple of times and then start with the intro chords.  Nothing feels better than the first time you play a song and it actually sounds like what you meant for it to sound like! 

Good luck!  Don't forget "a journey of a thousand miles, begins with a single step"

Ovation2 wrote:

Hi all you music lovers,

  I'm looking to get some info about my guitar.It's a 1967 Ovation 1121-4, square label,black numbers , serial F-442.  I've traced the model number on the ovation site that tells me it's a 67 but I'd like to know the exact date of production and if possible it's value. It's in excellent condition and has been modified to electric.  I would appreciate all the information as possible.

                                                                                      Thank You very much for the help.

Online

Let's try this again.  You need to go back to the forum index.  In the upper right hand side there is an area that says "post new topic"  that starts a new thread.  Make sure you use a good descpription of the thread so people know what it is about.

Ovation2 wrote:

Hi all you music lovers,

  I'm looking to get some info about my guitar.It's a 1967 Ovation 1121-4, square label,black numbers , serial F-442.  I've traced the model number on the ovation site that tells me it's a 67 but I'd like to know the exact date of production and if possible it's value. It's in excellent condition and has been modified to electric.  I would appreciate all the information as possible.

                                                                                      Thank You very much for the help.

I suggest that you post this a new thread.  Otherwise it will be buried in this thread.

gitaardocphil,

I'm 43 and have been playing a few months and am progressing nicely and I’m happy with my progress.  I know CAGED Em,Am,  G7, E7, etc.  I’ve finally gotten the F but need to work on speed with it next.  I play 40-60 min EVERY DAY.  I am playing lots of songs (playing them well if I do say so myself) and am having a BLAST.  I’m a fairly good singer and my interest in music has been life long and have planned on playing my entire life but I finally did something about it a few months ago when I jumped in and bought an electric guitar. 

I play mostly Country music but I’m the worlds biggest Bruce Springsteen fan so it’s really that I like to play ballads of country, rock, folk etc.

I made my trip through the guitar stores and first tried the Martins and Gibsons. Neither of those gave me the sound I was looking for.  The Gibson's were balanced but didn't have any "punch".  The Martins were quite nice but had a little too much low end for me.  I went to the next store (in a blinding snow storm!) and fell in love with a Taylor.  I eventually worked out a great deal on an 810 CE.  The sound was bright, clear, balanced and had PLENTY of "punch".  I got such a good deal that I'm hoping that my guitars appreciate in value like yours have!!

The only bad news is that my wife is still VERY mad at me!  I guess artists really do have to suffer for their work (lol)!

After having tried so many guitars, I think that I have realized something about the Martins.  Remember when I said that I am still pretty new to guitar.  I think because I'm new and because of the way I still stum like a beginner, the low end of the Martins overwhelmed the high end and so I think a better player can bring a more balanced sound out of the Martin. 

I really love my Taylor but when I become a better player and can handle the unique tones of the Martin, I may get a Martin too!  (plus that will give my wife some time to cool off!)

Regards,

Ranger

gitaardocphil wrote:

RANGER, All I tied to write is meant as information. Didn't I add other guitars as Epiphone, Takamine?
WHY SO MANY GUITARS, I COULD SAY THAT IT'S MY BUSINESS, BUT I AM NOT A PERSON WHO REACTS SO. I PREFER TO BE HONEST.  ABOUT MY ACOUSTICS:
It started with a junk coming since years to my consult. He needed money. THIS IS SOMETHING MOST PEOPLE DON'T KNOW. If I write that I helped a lot of people by charging them what they got back from our social security, like 20$ in stead of 30$. Adding all the 10$ I didn't ask, I could buy a house. Why? THIS IS ME. There are people who needed the money a lot more than I did. Some more? I GAVE ( not asking back that money) A LOT. WHAT WOULD YOU DO IF YOU HAVE A HOUSE CALL, AND YOU ENTER AN ICECOLD HOME, LIGHT COMING FROM CANDLES, electricity cut of, AND THEY HAD 5 KIDS, AND NO MONEY TO BUY FOOD? I GAVE 500$. To come again on that Junkie: he gave me his guitar, a MARTIN-HD28 like you bought, and you won't regret it. I invested by giving 8000$ to friends who wanted to take over a music store. Getting back the money = difficult, so we agreed that they paid me back with guitars. Before you know, you have 10 guitars.
WHY MARTINS AND GIBSONS? EVERY MUSIC STORE HAD, HERE IN BELGIUM, 75%OF THEIR STOCK were these guitars. TAYLOR, TAKAMINE unknown.
I ADORE THE SOUND, AND BECAUSE OF THE BRANDS ALL MY GUITARS ARE 2 to 3 TIMES MORE IN VALUE.
WEALTHY:  YES even this question deserves an answer. I took some big financial risks by buying a laser, a device to treat cellulitis with success. I worked 80 hours a week to be called "wealthy". How many hours do most people work?
I AM DISABLED DUE TO A CAR ACCIDENT I STARTED AGAIN BUT I HAD TO STOP, BECAUSE OF TOO SEVERE PHYSICAL PROBLEMS. AND A SECOND YES ABOUT BEING WEALTHY: I WAS AND STILL AM OVERINSURED RESULTING IN HAVING MORE THAN ENOUGH MONEY TO BUY 2 GUITARS IN NASHVILLE IN GRUHN'S STORE.
IT'S BY TAKING RISKS IN MY JOB, THAT I WAS "WEALTHY"AND BY BEING OVERINSURED. HERE THE MUSIC STORES changed a lot, having 60% more different brands, compared to 8 years. I DO WITH MY MONEY WHAT I WANT, and a lot of people told me that I could play on 1 guitar.
ALL MY ACOUSTICS ARE TWICE AS MUCH WORTH NOW.
So: I worked for free (if you go to a doctor here, they give you a receipt, send it to your company, and they pay you back as told. 30$ was the price, I asked 20$, and they got 25$ back. I AM TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE AND NOT ABOUT A BREAD. BEFORE YOU REALISE YOU HAVE MORE AND MORE GUITARS. Why do people collect stamps? is this so different or difficult to understand that I collect and play. You can take a guess: HOW MANY ELECTRIC GUITARS I OWN.
My only intention was to answer and offer my help, seeing that the guitars you mentioned were MARTINS and GIBSONS TOO. To give advise.
PLEASE DON'T JUDGE ME BECAUSE I AM BLESSED TO BUILD A NICE COLLECTION, see it as investment, to end: the value has tripled and I AM UNABLE TO LIVE A NORMAL LIFE, SO PLEASE RESPECT MY HOBBY, MY PASSION itis one of the few things that I can do: playing guitar.

My friend, I was, and am in way judging you!  I am in awe of your fabulous collection.  I think much of my intent was lost in the process of typing my thoughts and in language issues.  I am a person who seeks knowledge and likes to learn and likes to make educated decisions.  As such, I seek out information beyond reading reviews.  I like even more to speak to the "experts".  But the experts I like to talk to are average people who own the instruments and not salesmen in a store.  So my comment regarding being independently wealthy was made in a joking manner.  You see I frequent a Martin Guitar Forum where there are more than a few guys with 12 Martins.  A joking comment such as "Unless you are fabulously wealthy or secretely a rock/country musician" is usually met with a response such as "oh not wealthy, in fact my wife is going to kill me if I buy another guitar, but I fell in love with Martin's years ago and have been collecting them ever since" or on the off chance that a person might be wealthy you may get "well, a boy must have his toys, and most of my toys have appreciated in value".  Perhaps, as I said, this American sense of kidding gets lost in translation when words are often taken at their literal meaning.

My quest to buy a good guitar can be summed up in one word, “Why".  Why does a person choose a Martin?  Why does a person choose a Gibson?  Why does a person choose a Taylor?  If I’m going to spend a lot of my money on a high end guitar, what should I be looking for?  I was asking for advice.  Is it craftsmanship, is it looks, feel, action?  Is it the booming low end?  Is it a balanced and bright sound?  As I said, I’m relatively new to guitar, is one guitar better for a beginner?  I like country music and ballads.  Does one guitar suit that style of music better?  I will not be performing and will only be playing for myself in my house.  Is one style better for that? 

Please go back and re-read my post.  Imagine that I’m a newspaper reporter and that I’m interviewing you.  I’m doing a story on WHY people buy high end guitars.  If you do that, I think you will see that I wanted your advice.  Please pay attention to how many times that I ask “what do I get?"  That is a person asking for advice, not making judgments.

38

(240 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

Taylor 810ce
Alvarez PD80SC (that I'm tring to sell),
Strat Squire (that I took when my son bought my Fat Strat)

New Guitar Search Update:

Yesterday was the day.  I traveled about an hour to some guitar stores and had the opportunity to test a bunch of guitars.  Let me start by saying that my hour drive took an hour and half as I drove through lake effect snow and at times near white out conditions!  But, I have an SUV and, you’ve gotta have priorities!

I of course will qualify my opinions with the fact that I know I’m a new guitar player but I do have 2 functioning ears, have loved music my entire life and now in hindsight, realize that I had a clear mental impression of what I want MY guitar to sound like. 

I got to the first shop (the one where I purchased my Alvarez and Fat Strat) and sat down with the salesman we talked for a while as he told me how much he thought I would like a Martin DC16RGTE Aura.  I finally asked “well do you have one I can try?† and he said……No.  Talk about lunch bag let down!  So I ended up trying a bunch of other Martins.  I started with the HD35, then the HD28, and then a D18.  I probably should have gone in reverse order because I started at the top and worked my way down.  The HD35 is clearly out of my price range but it had a booming low end but still had some punch at the higher end.  The D18 also had the distinctive Martin low end but the booming lows seemed to overwhelm the high end.  All I could hear was that booming bass.  The HD 28 seemed somewhere in the middle to me.  I will say that all of the guitars had old strings and I finally pulled my digital tuner out and put the D18 in tune.  It was at least one note low on every string!  Is that something that they would have done on purpose to accentuate Martin’s reputation for strong booming low end?  I mean if a dumb-ass like me can notice how out of tune it is, how could accomplished players not notice?  I’ve got to tell you, that I went in prejudiced toward the Martins, but that booming bass just isn’t what I had in my mind.  I tried some various Gibsons.  The bottom line on the Gibsons, is that to me while they were a little more balanced, the majority of them had no “life† or no richness to the tone.  The only one I liked was the Song Writer Deluxe.  It was a beautiful guitar and the most lively of the bunch but certainly did not blow me away.  Finally, I tried the YariDY84C.  That guitar looks a lot like mine, sounds a little richer or fuller at both ends and costs about $1,000 more!  There was no way there was more than a $200 difference to my ear.

I left feeling a little depressed.  They are going to get me a DC16RGTE to try, but I just had a funny feeling in the pit of my stomach.  I’m thinking of spending A LOT of money and just was,…… hmm what’s the word, …..“under -whelmed†.  I really thought I would leave that store having made a decision but, I pointed my car DEEPER into the lake effect snows and headed to the shop that sells Taylors.  We went into their temperature and humidity controlled room and the owner and I talked for a few minutes and he got me a 310 and a GA3 (I think).  Well the first strum just blew me away!  It was like a 6 string explosion!  What I mean by that, is that I heard all 6 strings explode with sound.  It was like a person strumming a harp.  Every note was in perfect pitch and tone with the prior and subsequent.  This is the sound I had imagined in my mind!!  To directly compare, the Martin had a much more booming low end but when I played chords the low end was all I heard.  It’s possible that a far more experienced player can take one of those guitars and use the low end to accentuate without overwhelming the high end, but my playing ability is not there.  The Gibson, well that was more balanced in its sound but it was like comparing a firecracker to an M-80.  It’s like a pop vs. a BOOM. The GA3 had a more mellow tone, but the 310 really boomed at the low end and rang out at the higher end.  I was in love with the Taylor sound, I knew that instantly.  Now, the matter of aesthetics; I know it shouldn’t matter but I know myself enough to know that it does.  If we acknowledge that part of the sensory appreciation of an instrument is sound and feel, I have to admit that the visual component is also a factor me.  I just can’t get past those satin sides and back.  To me it looks like the luthier got tired and stained the back and sides but forgot to apply the varnish.  So I began looking at the guitars on the wall and after talking to the shop owner, he brought me a special deal.  There is an 810 that somebody put 2 nicks on the back.  Bottom line is that he is taking over $600 off of the Musician’s Friend price.  The 810 was just more of the 310 sound that I loved.  If the GA3 was skim-milk, the 310 was whole milk, and the 810 is heavy cream.  Rich and smooth!

I think I’m going to call the shop owner and make an offer on the 810.  It’s more than I want to spend but if I don’t buy it, I’m afraid that I will regret it the rest of my life.  If I buy a second high end guitar, I may very well go for that distinctive Martin sound, but if I’m going to have one, the Taylor is for me!

Now I just have to sell a 2 month old Alvarez and a 3 month old Fat Strat.

Tomorrow I'm off to try Martin's, Taylor's, Yari, and Gibson's at 2 music stores about an hour from here.  I've decided to pick the guitar I like without regard to the electronics as I may NEVER plug it in.  (If I fall for an accoustic/electric great).  If I ever need to plug one in I can always use my wifey's Ovation (which needs a serious neck adjustment.  The action is WAY too high)

Ranger1964 wrote:
C3 wrote:

WOW looking at the replies here i see i am not the only one that has picked up the guitar around the 40 mark. I have just started learning about 18 months ago with my kids.
I too learnt that there is ahuge difference in guitars. Basically i jus started on a very cheap guitar (Ashton) and when my family wanted to buy me a neat xmas gift we went to our favorite music store. The lesson i learnt was to first ignore the price tags and the brands. Wander through the shop and pick up every guitar that catches your eye and sit down and play them.
The sounds differs drastically from one to the other, gradually you will end up with a few guitars that you like, that is when you look at the price tags and see what fits into your budget. The important thing is the "what you like" for sound.
Dont forget also that a simple change of strings to a good quality set can also make a huge difference to the sound of the guitar.

I actually found that some of the $1,000 plus guitars actually sounded worse (to me) than my $90 cheapy. I ended up settling on a fender for $400. I put a set of high end classical nylon strings on it and it has the perfect sound for me.

Oh and if you are buying an electric / accoustic fdont forget to ask them to plug it in at the shop and this will give you nad idea of the sound through the pickups as this can make a big difference also.

Interesting but what I didn't say in my original post was that my youngest got interested in guitar and THAT was what finally pushed me to finally take up guitar.  I don't know, I kind of felt "dorky" wanting to start guitar at 30, then 35, then 40, and finally I did it, but really only because my son did it.  I guess the lesson is that if I hadn't started now, I may never have.  You know once we get to be adults and parents sometimes it's hard to "bare our souls" and try something completely new.  But, I try to teach my kids that life is about learning and I try to give them examples of that.  I got my MBA at 38, learned to mat and frame photos about the same time took up home improvement/carpentry at 39 and took up guitar at 43.  The one thing I try to tell people is that if you are interested in playing you can do it by just learning CAGED and in a month or so be able to play MANY songs.  So it's never too late to start.

Maybe we should start a "Late Starters" thread?

C3 wrote:

WOW looking at the replies here i see i am not the only one that has picked up the guitar around the 40 mark. I have just started learning about 18 months ago with my kids.
I too learnt that there is ahuge difference in guitars. Basically i jus started on a very cheap guitar (Ashton) and when my family wanted to buy me a neat xmas gift we went to our favorite music store. The lesson i learnt was to first ignore the price tags and the brands. Wander through the shop and pick up every guitar that catches your eye and sit down and play them.
The sounds differs drastically from one to the other, gradually you will end up with a few guitars that you like, that is when you look at the price tags and see what fits into your budget. The important thing is the "what you like" for sound.
Dont forget also that a simple change of strings to a good quality set can also make a huge difference to the sound of the guitar.

I actually found that some of the $1,000 plus guitars actually sounded worse (to me) than my $90 cheapy. I ended up settling on a fender for $400. I put a set of high end classical nylon strings on it and it has the perfect sound for me.

Oh and if you are buying an electric / accoustic fdont forget to ask them to plug it in at the shop and this will give you nad idea of the sound through the pickups as this can make a big difference also.

Interesting but what I didn't say in my original post was that my youngest got interested in guitar and THAT was what finally pushed me to finally take up guitar.  I don't know, I kind of felt "dorky" wanting to start guitar at 30, then 35, then 40, and finally I did it, but really only because my son did it.  I guess the lesson is that if I hadn't started now, I may never have.  You know once we get to be adults and parents sometimes it's hard to "bare our souls" and try something completely new.  But, I try to teach my kids that life is about learning and I try to give them examples of that.  I got my MBA at 38, learned to mat and frame photos about the same time and took up guitar at 43.  The one thing I try to tell people is that if you are interested in playing you can do it by just learning CAGED and in a month or so be able to play MANY songs.  So it's never too late to start.

Maybe we should start a "Late Starters" thread?

I've "decided" (many of my decisions are temporary, lol) that I just can't justify a $2,400 guitar now.  Dads of 3 teens sometimes need to comprimise and for a new player that should be PLENTY of guitar.  Who knows, get the kids through school and maybe buy a second acoustic to add to the one I'm about to get.  So now my quest is the "BEST" guitar for less than $1,500-ish.  I know that there are some Martins, Takamines, Yaris, and Taylors in that range but it eliminates Gibsons.  I have my eye on a Taylor 310ce.  I'm making a trip to Lousville in 2 weeks and there are a few biggger music stores there so I hope to get to sample a few of each mfg.  One thing I know, I do like a little brighter sound, so that may lead towards or away from one mfg or another.  Of course my Alvarez was a surprise to me when I bought it so I'm not necessarily eliminating any mfg. but I would aleast like to have heard of it, KWIM?

BTW-the $1,500 max doesn't mean that I will go that high, it just means that I will eliminate anything more than that from the running.

44

(20 replies, posted in Acoustic)

I'm new to this forum but posted this on a defferent one.  Hope it helps.



If you always arrived late for your destination, logic would say "leave earlier" right??!!  Well, like many newbies I've (mostly) mastered CAGED (Em, Am, E7 A7... the easy ones) but when I played songs I still would have those INFURIATING breaks in my strumming while trying to hit the chord change on the correct word (or even syllable).  I also noticed that when not playing a song, just strumming and switching chords, I could switch very quickly.  WELL, I don't know how or why it occurred to me, but I noticed that I was trying to make chord changes exactly on the word (or syllable).  Something made me realize that even the most accomplished player in the world (Esteban? hehehe j/k) would need SOME time to change chords, a half a second, a quarter of a second, whatever amount of time is required, chord changes are NOT instantaneous.  So, in an epiphany of sorts it occurred to me "if you are always arriving late, leave earlier dummy!".  So I did.  I left earlier.  Then, as often happens, an epiphany led to a eureka!  The chord changes don't happen instantaneously on a word or syllable, the END there.  Meaning, how ever much time you need, you start the chord change a few words before you need to “hit"  the new chord.  It is barely noticeable and improved my song playing maybe 142.93% instantly (and my enjoyment 10 times as much).

There are some caveats.  You need to know the chords, you need to have developed some fairly good chord transition speed, and you need to be able to play most of the chords without looking at the neck (BTW-as a newbie, don’t be afraid to try this.  You will be very surprised how adept you are at it when you just don’t allow yourself to look at the neck).  But, if you can do all that and are still driving yourself insane trying to put it all together playing those songs, always hitting the chord late or after an infuriating delay…..leave earlier!!!!

OMG.  I can't believe I'm actually thinking his but ... here goes. I really like my Alvarez and if I upgrade to an Alvarez-Yari hand made I can get one that looks almost exactly like my current one and wifey would be none the wiser.  Mind you, I have the money squirrelled away (birthday, CHristmas gifts etc) but after 22 years of marriage to the greatest girl in the world, sometimes you know which battles to fight.  Of course maybe I'll try the Yari and not notice any difference.  The shop I go to carries on the high end Yari, Gibson and Martin.  I will need to travel to find some Takamines or Taylors to try.

gitaardocphil wrote:

Yes indeed, all these artists, who can afford 50 very, very expensive guitars, well they receive an own model, or guitars for free, endorsement.
I own 12 acoustics, Martins and Gibsons, so I am used to their sound and because I am so spoiled it is more difficult to buy a guitar like an Epiphone EJ-200 similar to a Gibson SJ-200 (which I have)
A problem, often neglected is buying a 2000$ Gibson and play it a few months to put it back in the case, to start again years later. If you want a high priced guitar I am 100% convinced that you would love the sound. I noticed that even the Big BRANDS, do have cheaper models, like Martin D-1.
suggestion: listen to different brands on youtube, and go to a store and try the big 3: Gibson, Martin, Taylor, followed by other brands as Blueridge, Takamine, Epiphone.

Ok, but let me ask you this (this is the crux of my post) you say that you own 12 acoustics Martins and Gibsons.  Why?  Unless you are fabulously wealthy or secretely a rock/country musician, you have chosen to spend your hard earned on money on premium guitars. So why Gibson and Martins.  What is it about the 2 brands that has made you decide that you are willing to go to that upper price point, not once or twice but 12 times.  Is the sound? the feel? does it relate to recording music?  Is it that they are just recognized as the best (as the man said "I am easily satisfied with the very best" I think it was Churchill).  That is what I'm trying to drill down to.  What do I get when I go up to the $1,200 range (better woods, probably solid sides and back anything else?) what does that translate into in terms of my playing and listening experience? What do I get when I go to $2,400 I know some have said ornamentation and I can see that in some of the Gibsons but heck, Martins are pretty basic even at the high end.

Sorry to ask so many questions but what I'm trying to do is find out from real players why they have chosen to (beyond just financial constraints) to pick a certain price point.  I'm an avid golfer and 2 times I went to Palm Springs,CA for a week courtesy of Golf Magazine and was a club tester for them so I'm familiar with reviews and I'm kind of looking for a breakdown of what players think matters and what doesn't.

cytania wrote:

Hi Ranger, every guitar you own teaches you something. It's not guarranteed that an expensive instrument will sound good and there are some great sounding mid-range guitars out there.

First off let's discount any instrument that is expensive because of cosmetics. Inlays and veneers are nice but icing on the cake.

Now we get down to sound. As you buy guitars you may be reacting to your previous main player. So say your last guitar was a bit over bright the next purchase might be woody and boxy. It's not just overcompensation but your ear and musical taste evolving.

There's also a big difference between a guitar you might use for recording or playing in your home and the kind of instrument you could gig or even get out at the family barbecue. Expensive instruments can remain in the case because you don't dare scratch them!

Martin and Taylor are big names and you do pay a premium. Checkout Freshman, BlueRidge and Tanglewood's  mid to upper mid offerings for real tone value. Having said this a Martin or Taylor will always retain some resale/part exchage value when less well regarded names may not be accepted by stores, depends if you'll be trading in ever.

Beware guitar shop salesmen playing a guitar at you. Those guys are often way talented players and can make any instrument sound good straight out the box. My local store guy demonstrated a Yamaha jazz box to me, he could make it sing, I could hardly raise any volume from it. Make sure you play the guitar yourself and don't tell yourself 'it must be my ears I'll buy it anyway'. I played some astonishingly expensive Freshman guitars in a downtown store where the salesman read snippets from reviews that praised them to the sky, but to me they sounded overly trebley. Maybe my ears and fingers aren't ready for them yet...

Thank you.  I'm glad you pointed out that you might go form one guitar to another just because it sounds different.  When the salesman played the Martin "woody" is exactly how I would describe it and the Gibson sounded a little brighter to me (more like my Alvarez) so I started thinking "well a Martin is the way to go, listen to that tone" but as you point out it was DIFFERENT but that doesn't make it better.  I do trust the salesmen BUT I will decide which guitar I like based on how it feels and plays.  In fact, when I walked in the store, I had done a lot of research and was ready to buy a Yamaha at about $500.  The slaesman let me try it and I asked him to show me anything else that I may want to consider.  That's when he gave me Alvarez.  At that point I could only do a few chords and could barely change BUT I knew immediately that I like the Alvarez over the Yamaha.  It sounds as if you are saying that there are some GREAT guitars in the mid price range and beyond that the difference may be cosmetics and brand name recogniton?  That is also something that interested me in the Taylors, Martins and Takamines.  They have some beautiful guitars in the mide price point.  I noticed you didn't mention Gibsons.  Is that because they only start at the upper price point?  I've noticed that the vast majority of country musicians are playing Gibsons.  That's why I'm wondering "are they playing them because they are the best" or is Gibson sponsoring them so players like me will buy them just becasue of their stable of artists?  One time I owned a hunting rifle that was so beautiful that I was afraid to use it.  In fact the only time I used I scratched it taking it out of my truck!  I almost barfed!  I used it once and got rid of it!  I swore I would NEVER own a gun again that I was afraid to use.  I guess the same holds true with a guitar.  Most likely the only place my guitar will ever go is my bed room, living room, my front porch, and maybe to church.  Momma may kill me if I buy a new guitar but definitely will kill me if I say I want 2 because I'm afraid to play my new one, so I guess I need to keep that in mind also.

Some background before we get started.  I'm 43 and have been playing a few months and am progressing nicely and I’m happy with my progress.  I know CAGED Em,Am,  G7, E7, etc.  I’ve finally gotten the F but need to work on speed with it next.  I play 40-60 min EVERY DAY.  I am playing lots of songs (playing them well if I do say so myself) and am having a BLAST.  I’m a fairly good singer and my interest in music has been life long and have planned on playing my entire life but I finally did something about it a few months ago when I jumped in and bought a guitar. 

I play both types of music Country and Western.  Ok j/k but I do play mostly country but I’m the words biggest Bruce Springsteen fan so it’s really that I like to play ballads of country, rock, folk etc.

I started with a Fender Squire, gave t to my son bought a Mexican Fat Strat but when my interest in music began to clarify I realized I needed an acoustic guitar.  My wifey plays, but I hate her Ovation so I went out and bought an Alvarez PD80SC and I really like it but……..now things are a little more clear to me or maybe less clear?

I paid about $550 for my Alvarez but let’s say for simplicity sake that there is a $600, $1,200, and $2,400 price point.  So my question is this for experienced players, know-it-alls, heck anybody with an opinion.  Of course money matters but I’m trying to decide if I should maybe go up to one of the other price points.  I admit that I’m brand conscious so let’s get that out there.  At the $1,200 price point there are some beautiful: Martin’s, Taylor’s, and Takamine’s.  At $2,400 there are all of the above plus some wonderful Gibson’s.  If we presume that this is a life long hobby of mine, it is just gnawing at me that maybe I should step up a bit and never worry about my equipment again.  So what am I really getting different at each price point?  I will probably never perform but maybe at church so I want an acoustic/electric.  I don’t believe that only professional musicians are entitled to superior sounding music.  Yes they may be being paid for it, but hell if a $1,200 or $2,400 guitar sounds better, well hell, I’m my own audience so who deserves to experience it more than me?!  But what will the difference be at each of those ranges?

I was in a local shop the other day and the salesman was showing me a Martin and a Gibson Songwriter Deluxe (the one that started all of this questioning), they sounded MUCH different from each other but is the listening or playing experience better?  I know it’s probably not twice as good ($1,200) or 4 times as good ($2,400) but is it better? I’m certain that if “we" (I need your help) decide on a price point of either the $1,200 or $2,400 I can find the one I like (but I still want specific suggestions), but right now I need to know if I should A) not bother, B) find a nice $1,200 guitar (I’m liking what I’m reading about the Takamine’s) or is it worth it to C) go up to the $2,400 range?

Sorry for how long this is, but hey what’s more fun to talk about than guitars?

Thanks.