2,976

(5 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Lots of ways to play G


At the nut


-3-

-0-

-0-

-0-

-2-

-3-


Barred at the third fret.


-3-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-5-

-3-


Barred at the 10th fret


-10-

-12-

-12-

-12-

-10-

-X-


C shape at the 7th fret


-7-

-8-

-7-

-9-

-10-

-x-


There's lots of others.  Get a chord book and learn some of them.  The "right" one is the one that fits with what you're trying to play.

2,977

(13 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>James McCormick wrote on Sun, 15 October 2006 13&#58;38</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">


Although song writing can be a very frustrating process, I am finding that my songs typically have a very simple lyrical starting point - - - it might be just a phrase or a couple of words, or it might be a line ot two that feels good to say.

</td></tr></table>


For me it's the exact opposite.  It usually starts with a little bit of melody or chord progression.   I'm not really good with lyrics, but once I figure out how I want it to sound,  I can usually work something in that doesn't sound to contrived.   But like you, once it starts, it all tends to come out at once.   It might take me two days to get started, but only two hours to finish.


I've read some of the lyrics you put into the songwriter's contest, and enjoyed them a lot.

2,978

(13 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>sanguine wrote on Sun, 15 October 2006 06&#58;24</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
hmmm interesting thing to say...the only problem is that i live in the middle of no where (nebraska) there arent any real good radio stations withg music i like (oldies mainly). the other thin is im new in town and unknown and largely disliked or 'tolerated' by my peers so that is not really a possibiblty at the moment but thnx any way
</td></tr></table>


You can get good radio on the internet, too.


KEXP in Seattle is a great station that is always playing new music.   KGSR in Austin plays nothing but good music.  They both have streaming feeds availble.

2,979

(13 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Two easy answers.


Get some new songs.


Write your own songs.


I gotta think the latter will give you more pleasure.

2,980

(15 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>noise wrote on Thu, 12 October 2006 17&#58;01</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
your right. its a nasty habit i didnt even realise i had until now. thanks for tips though. chords are sounding a lot clearer now and even started attempting barre chords which i was too scared to even look at before. they dont sound great yet and are making a mess out of my chubby fingers but i feel like im progressing once more. still long way to go yet. tell me its worth it!!!!
</td></tr></table>


It's totally worth it, or so I'm told.   <img src="images/smiley_icons/icon_biggrin.gif" border=0 alt="Very Happy">  I'm not "there" either.  I think it's a lot like golf, in that you're never really "there,"  so you should at least enjoy the trip.


Having said that, *absolutely* learn to barre.  Just form a barre across the neck, and play each string until it resonates clearly.  Don't even try to play a chord just yet.   Do that a lot (every day), until you can do it and not feel like you're strangling the neck.  Then add some fingers.   Your hands will cramp a little (or a lot!), but as you practice, they will get stronger, and it will become second nature.


Barre chords open up the fretboard for you.  It's one of those techniques that will kick you up to the next plateau in your development.   At least it did for me.

2,981

(5 replies, posted in Song requests)

You rock!


He's selling out to buy her a cow.


And he didn't get the dang ring on the radio, he'll order on the way and go on the first day of the spring.


Now my life is complete.    <img src="images/smiley_icons/icon_biggrin.gif" border=0 alt="Very Happy">

2,982

(56 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>bedrock wrote on Wed, 26 July 2006 03&#58;48</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
Other than black gospel and some cracker spirtuals (like in O Brother Where Art Thou), "Contemporary Christian Music" can best be used to put you to sleep.

</td></tr></table>


Seems like you answered your own questions there.


Gospel and "cracker spirituals" (we like to call it "bluegrass") is great music.  If I were God, that's what I'd invent to celebrate "me."


I think you're projecting the "%90" rule a bit.   %90 of *everything* is crap.   Christian music is no exception to that rule.   Neither is whatever you like.

2,983

(5 replies, posted in Song requests)

That's the one!  I'm primarily looking for the lyrics at this point.  It's bluegrass, so it's not overly complex.


I need to know what happens after he buys Linda Lou a cow, and verify he bought the wedding ring off the radio on the first day of the spring.


Really!

2,984

(12 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Hendo wrote on Sun, 08 October 2006 13&#58;18</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
Thought I'd affirm that this is a common thing to feel.  I struggled with it in the past, especially G to C when I was starting as it was such a big move for my fingers.  I almost packed it in but as the good advice said before, practice it all day and all night all week.  You will see improvement soon.
</td></tr></table>


Certainly you want to practice chord changes until you can confidently fret all of them.    But there is another reason to practice chord changes, and that is to learn the fretboard.


Playing G to C is a pretty big jump *if you play it at the nut.*   D -> G is even bigger.


G           C

-3-         -0-

-0-         -1-

-0-         -0-

-0-         -2-

-2-         -3-

-3-         -0-


That's a whole lot of finger moving.  But it doesn't have to be that way.


G -> C is a perfect IV interval, and there is a much easier way to play that in pretty much any key, as long as you can barre well.


You can also play G as a barre chord at the 3rd fret.  It's an "E shape" chord, so it's pretty straight forward.



G

-3-

-3-

-4-

-5-

-5-

-3-


C can also be played as a barre chord at the 3rd fret.  It's an A shape chord, so transitioning from a barred G is as simple as moving from E to A and back.


C

-3-

-5-

-5-

-5-

-3-

-3-


That's a much easier change for the exact same progression.


Take that C chord down the neck two frets (so you're barre is at the fifth fret) and you're playing D.  G C  D with hardly any movement at all.


But the real beauty of that is that it's portable.  You can move that barred E shape anywhere, and it's the I  IV  V progression.   Bar the 1st fret, and you're playing F Bb C  Bar the 2nd fret, and you're playing F#  B and Db, etc.


When I practice chord changes, I have two specific goals.   


1.  Fret them confidently and consistently.

2.  Find the most efficient way of doing it.   The best players I've ever seen have an uncanny efficieny of motion in their hands.  They'll be ripping along, and it hardly looks like they are moving at all.  That's how I want to be.


So practice the barre, and it will open up the fretboard for you, and make chord changes a lot easier.   And practice a lot!

2,985

(4 replies, posted in About Chordie)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>admin wrote on Tue, 10 October 2006 00&#58;04</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
The default songbook always exists. Technical reasons for that...
</td></tr></table>


So where might I ask for a feature request to either fix this so it can be deleted, or make one of my other songbooks the "default?"

2,986

(14 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Prince (the artist formerly known as...) also slings a mighty axe.


No, seriously!


<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh8dYJWcsdg" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fh8dYJWcsdg</a>

2,987

(15 replies, posted in Acoustic)

I was a "grabber" before I was a "light holder" and I still catch myself grabbing.


It's a hard habit to break.

2,988

(4 replies, posted in About Chordie)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>admin wrote on Mon, 09 October 2006 16&#58;31</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
Delete the songs first, and then you will get the option to delete the book.
</td></tr></table>



That works for songbooks I create, but it doesn't work for the default "My songbook" songbook.  That's the one I wish to dispose of.

2,989

(14 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Shawn Lane, Alan Holdsworth,  Bella Fleck.

2,990

(15 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>noise wrote on Mon, 09 October 2006 18&#58;45</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
hi all. just started learning the marvellous guitar however do lack of time and funds im teaching myself and am getting through pretty well through sheer determination.however when praticing chords my thunb seems to wander off towards the top of the guitar orslip overthe top. ive watched other people play to try and answer this yet they all have different rules regarding the thumb. in general( and when practinsing basic chords E A d etc)where does my thumb go and how do i keep it there. plus any other practice tips would be much greatly appreciated.i seem to have hit a lull and really want get better.cheers guys 
</td></tr></table>



One of the best "tips" I ever got was to keep the pad of your thumb planted firmly on the back of the neck.  It gives you much better reach with the rest of your fingers, gives you a stable platform to pivot the hand, gives you a good marker for moving reliably up and down the neck,  and gives you a good "pinch point" for the barre.

2,991

(12 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Jace wrote on Sun, 08 October 2006 09&#58;38</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
Thank you so very much. I must admit, I'm still confused but I will print this off and see if it starts to become clear.


I saw something for sale on eBay that is a big circle that you are supposed to turn the dial and it tells you all the scales and things. They were asking about 9 dollars for it. Do you think this is of any benefit to me or am I too new to make sense or use out of it?


Thanks again so much. That was so nice of you to go into such detail to help me.


Jace
</td></tr></table>


That would be the circle of 5ths, although I don't know that I'd pay nine bucks for one.


Here's one for free.


<a href="http://www.cyberfret.com/theory/circle-of-5ths-major/index.php" target="_blank"> http://www.cyberfret.com/theory/circle- … or/index.p hp</a>


Here is a couple of ways in which you might use it the next time you sit down to practice.


You're sitting around trying to figure out how to play a song you've got looped on the radio.  You figure out that if you strike the A string,  you get a tone that plays pretty well throughout the song.  This is a good indicator that the song is in the key of A.


So now what?   We know that %90 of modern music is based on the I  IV   and V notes of a scale.   We know we're in A.  So what are the IV and V of A?   


Take a look at the circle, and find 'A'.     Working clockwise, the note immediately behind any note on the circle is the IV of that scale.  So we now know the IV of  A major is  'D'.   The note immediately in front of a note on the circle is the V of that scale, so we know the V of A  is E.  So you can then play your song with A D and E chords.   


Pick a couple of songs in your song book, and you'll find this pattern repeating itself over and over and over again.   Put some songs on loop, figure out what key they are in by finding that one note that goes well throughout the song, and find the IV and V.     That's kind of fun, and educational as well.


Another way that the circle is incredibly usefull is in transposing a song from one key to another.  Lets say that your song in A isn't good for you to sing as it's too low,  and you want to sing it a little bit higher.  Say an interval of a third higher.


On the circle, the note that is four notes in front of another is the third of that scale.  So moving up a third would mean we are now playing in C#.   So what are the I  IV  and V of C#?    Use the circle and find out, and you can play your song in a whole new key.


Another good use?   Figureing out where to start to solo, if you're into that kind of thing.   Each major scale has an associated "harmonic minor" scale associated with it (don't worry about that just yet, just know that it is so) and that is a great key in which to solo over major keys.  You can know which harmonic goes with which major by knowing the VI of the major scale.   On the circle,  the VI of a given scale is the note three places in front of it.  So if you were jamming in C, and someone wanted a solo,  you could use the circle to figure out that the natural harmonic minor of C is A, and play your solo using the A minor scale (because it's just another pattern, too),  and you're shredding like a pro.


Don't expect to learn all this stuff in a night.   It can get complicated, and there are people that carry PhDs in the stuff.   The best way to learn it is to put it to use in your practice sessions.  Play a chord, and then say, "I'm gonna play the IV of that scale" and use the circle to find it.   


The key to all of it is that it is *all* based on scales.  Every bit of it.   So practice them, and memorize those intervals.   Whole whole half whole whole whole whole half.

2,992

(4 replies, posted in About Chordie)

How do I delete a song book?  I want to dump the default songbook, but I can't figure out how.


Thanks!

2,993

(12 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Jace wrote on Fri, 06 October 2006 20&#58;53</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
I tried taking lessons at three different times in my life and stopped for various reasons, but it was really clear that I just can't seem to learn to read music. I will try to learn theory and see if I can gain a better understanding.
</td></tr></table>


Don't get all wrapped up trying to learn to read standard notation.  It's not necessary to understanding theory, although it does help a little, in that it's a good tool to help you visualize things when it comes to chord formation.   For most modern music,  it's overkill.


Instead of standard notation,  as far as scales are concerned, just use the note's place in the scale.


I   II    III   IV     V    VI   VII     Where I is the root,  II is the second note, etc.   This will make a little more sense once you understand what the various scales are and how they are derived.


The important thing to remember (and by that, I mean *memorize*) is the interval between the notes of the scale.   Between I and II is a whole step.   Between II  and III is a whole step.  Between III  and IV is a half step, etc...   That is easy to translate to the fretboard because each fret is a half step from the one above it.   You can see that by walking down a single string as I discussed above.


A lot of people get really intimidated by all the possible scales.   There are 12 notes in the chromatic scale, and each one of them can be the root for a major scale, a variety of minor scales, and a bunch of other types of scales as well (pentatonics, etc).  That sounds like a whole lot, but it really isn't if you understand that you don't need to memorize each scale on it's own (leave that for horn players <img src="images/smiley_icons/icon_smile.gif" border=0 alt="Smile"> ), just the interval patern for it.   If you can memorize the interval patern for a natural minor scale, you can play all of the natural minors, because it's the same no matter where you start, and it translates to the fretboard really easily.


So get used to thinking of scales and chords in terms of I  II  III, etc, and the intervals between them.   Then you can learn things like


A major chord is the  I  III   and  V of it's associated major scale.    C major is C, E and G.   I   III   V.


A huge amount of modern music is derived from the I   IV  and V chords for the key it is in.    Someone else mentioned learning to play  a "12 bar blues."   Great idea.    That's a 12 bar I    IV    V pattern.      If you were playing in C,  you would play   C  F and G (I   IV   V).    If you were in E  you would play  E   A  and B  (I   IV   V),   etc.    And so on.   


I'm certain that one of the books you own has the "Circle of 5ths" in it.  In reality, that is a "Circle of intervals,"  and is a powerfull tool for understanding this stuff.   I'd like to get it inlayed into all my guitars, and have gone so far as to consider a tattoo of it on my arm.    <img src="images/smiley_icons/icon_biggrin.gif" border=0 alt="Very Happy">


Playing scales will help improve your technique.   *Understanding* them will help improve your musicianship.


I think this forum aught to have a "Theory" section to discuss this kind of stuff.


Good luck.   And practice a lot.

2,994

(5 replies, posted in Song requests)

Any reference to this song, either by the Louvin Brothers or the cover by Open Road would be much appreciated.

2,995

(12 replies, posted in Acoustic)

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>Jace wrote on Fri, 06 October 2006 00&#58;22</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
Thanks Ken. I found a site that showed 3 scales it said I should learn. I printed off the first one. All it says is Major Scale but I don't know what letter it is (a c g etc.)so I'm a might confused. But I'll take your advice and work on one song and scale at a time.


Jace
</td></tr></table>


Theory is hard to get, but once you get it, it will make your playing a ton easier.


Here's the deal with major scales, and how they relate to the fretboard.   


You should already know that each fret will raise or lower the tone a "half-tone (or step)."   If you skip a fret, you play a whole tone.   Play an open E, then fret the 1st fret on the E string, and you're playing F (a half tone up from E), one more fret is F# (a whole tone up from E), one more, G, etc.


A major scale is made up of the following steps.   "Root" is the first note of the scale, and indicates which scale it is.  If you start on the A (5th) string, you're playing A major, etc.


root, whole step, whole step, half step, whole step, whole step, whole step, half step


So sit down with your guitar, and fret the following on any sting.


Open, 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 11, 12


Congratulations, you've just played a major scale.  Notice that from root, it's whole, whole, half, etc...


The key relationship you want to make is between the steps, and where you fret.   Try this (it's easier if your guitar has a cutaway).  Pick any note on the fretboard as root, and then play the whole, whole, half, whole patern from there.  Try it from C (third fret on the A string).  C  Major scale, just like that.


So now you have one pattern for playing a major scale.  But there are other patterns, too, which is what you are probably looking at.  It doesn't give you a key because it will be the same pattern no matter what key you are playing in.    Because it's the same pattern no matter what scale it is, you can play that pattern from (almost) anywhere, and it will be a major scale.   You can play scales and not even know what key they are in, just by using that scale pattern.


So why are scales important?  Because every song is in some key, and if you can play in that key, you can figure out the song.  Scales are the root of chords as well.  A major chord is the root, third, and fifth note of it's associated major scale.  All of the modes you have heard about are based on major scales.   


Theory will make you a better player.  It's one thing to figure out which notes should be played, but understanding *why* you play those notes, and not others is a huge step.


Good luck, and practice a lot.

2,996

(5 replies, posted in Electric)

Break your practice routines into three distinct parts.  Early on, focus on part one.  As you get better at each step, you can spend more time on the later steps.


One part should focus solely on building strength and dexterity.  Play scales and chord progressions until your hands cramp.  Rest a few minutes, and then play until your hands cramp again.  Repeat.


Part two should focus on learning the fretboard and music theory.  Find all the Cs on the board.  Play the major scales, and their relative minors.  Work all the various chord types for a given key (major, minor, M7, etc...) learn the circle of 5ths.  That kind of stuff will make playing songs a million times easier once your hands are in good shape.


Part three (and you may want to wait a while) is to play some songs.  Find a couple you like, and practice the crap out of them.


Do this every day.

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>upyerkilt wrote on Tue, 03 October 2006 13&#58;06</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
jerome yer right.

A band should be based on it's live performances ( it was you that said that  wasnt it?, never mind, great sentance anyway whoever it was)

</td></tr></table>


It wasn't me that said that, but it's certainly something I've said before, and believe.  Great bands play great shows.


Some bands are simply better live.  ZZ Top and Jane's Addiction both come to mind as bands who's live shows completely blow their studio stuff away.


Some bands simply suck live, and that takes away a whole lot from their studio stuff.  It tells me that the studio sound is a result of great sound engineering, rather than great musicianship.  Depeche Mode and Mars Volta are some of the worst live shows I've ever seen, and while I never really liked DM, I did like Volta.


What makes a great band, to me, is great musicians.  That's why Zepplin and Floyd and Rush are still great, and always will be.  Jimmy Page, David Gilmore, and Lee/Peart are all great musicians and songwriters.  Any band they play in could be great.

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>upyerkilt wrote on Sat, 30 September 2006 10&#58;30</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
lmao

I have no idea who any of those bands are you mentioned apart from poison, a band I used to love but "one of the greatest" ????? nah, no way, they may have sold venues out but not stadiums, they may have been good musicians but not fantastic.


Although Michael Jacko, even though I dont like his stuff apart from the earth song ( at a push) he would have to be in the greatest as fans and album sales and sell out concerts for years upon years.


Ken
</td></tr></table>


That's kind of my point.  If you don't know who Shawn Lane is, or Bella Fleck, you should look them up.   Both are phenomenally tallented players that had they taken up a more "popular" style would regularly be ranked amongst the greates of all time.  Lane is dead now, so his legacy will have to be carried on through his fan base, but Fleck and the Flecktones are still playing, and you should get out and see them if you can.  Check your small venue listings.


Lane, I think, is worth special note, as he was a child prodigy, and played with Black Oak Arkansas when he was like 14 years old.  Then he became a legendary blues player in the Memphis area, and finally carried himself off to Inda to study carnatic music with his contemporaries over there.


An example of his melodic and technical genious.  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoqRENuuLrs" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoqRENuuLrs</a>


Point being, he could have quite easily played contemporary rock, become a shred monkey and made a gazillion as a rock star.  But he didn't.  He followed his interests, and played what he wanted to, and the result is truly great, even though I'm probably the only person in a 10 block radius that's heard of him.


So compare that to Jackson.  "Thriller" was, at one point, the highest selling album of all time.  The album it knocked off for the #1 spot?  The sound track to "Saturday Night Fever."   I've see Poision, and they filled the stadium in the mid 80s.


So what I'm saying is that "greatness" has little to do with "popularity."  The popular tide sometimes brings up a bit of sewage now and again.

<table border="0" align="center" width="90%" cellpadding="3" cellspacing="1"><tr><td class="SmallText"><b>upyerkilt wrote on Wed, 29 March 2006 13&#58;08</b></td></tr><tr><td class="quote">
I see with this thread people are just typing in their favourite band and not really thinking of success that bands have had or still having, i.e. SLIPKNOT??? come on, do they sell out thousands upon thousands worldwide??? no, I dont think so, so they cannot be included as well as a few more mentioned here, might be good or great bands but not the best of all time.

</td></tr></table>


Nah.  Greatness has absolutley nothing to do with how many albums you sell or how many people you can pack into a stadium.


True greats like Bella Fleck and Shawn Lane stand heads and shoulders above populars like Michael Jackson and Poison, groups who regularly sold out at one time.


Greatest band ever?  Marine Corps Drum and Bugle Corps, followed up by the Flecktones.  <img src="images/smiley_icons/icon_smile.gif" border=0 alt="Smile">

3,000

(21 replies, posted in Acoustic)

It's an inherent problem with tablature.  There is no rhythm, so you're stuck having to figure out what is played where.


If you want to see all of the music, you need to learn to read standard notation.