2,551

(8 replies, posted in Acoustic)

gitaardocphil wrote:

Jerome's chords are easier to change faster than my chords, but I call this more a skill. Try the different ways for your chords in barre, and than you can make conclusions.

Well, the thing about this C G D progression is that  it's just a IV I V progression in the key of G.   The I IV and V chords of *any* key are always easily available to you within three frets as long as you're playing the E or A shapes.  The I and the IV are available without moving your hand if you're in the E form, and the I and the V are available without moving your hand if you're in the A form.   That's what makes the barre so powerful, particularly for rock and roll and modern pop.

2,552

(8 replies, posted in Acoustic)

WeaserP wrote:

Look up the CAGED system of fretting and it should give you 5 ways to play the chord, typically at least 4 being barred.

Quoted for truth.  The CAGED system roxors.

2,553

(49 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Yeah.  Your problems usually end when you move out and start paying your own freight.  Amazingly enough, your parents get a whole lot smarter right about then, too.

No one has ever figured out why that is.

2,554

(8 replies, posted in Acoustic)

C = A form at 3rd fret.
G = E form at 3rd fret.
D = A form at 5th fret.

2,555

(12 replies, posted in Electric)

Get a new drummer?  big_smile

2,556

(31 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Stuck in the Middle by Steeler Wheels.

"Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right!"

Alan Holdsworth.

2,558

(12 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Fess up.  If you fix it and hide it, you're still in trouble if she finds out.   Tell her you busted it, it was an accident,  and make it right.

2,559

(6 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

In American politics, candidates will use any method they can to get their face and message in front of the electorate.  We don't have state funding for elections, so each candidate has to raise their own money.    This leads to lots of them using things like facebook and mySpace, as it's cheap, and reaches a lot of people.

2,560

(5 replies, posted in Electric)

Practice.  A lot.

2,561

(3 replies, posted in About Chordie)

Excellent idea.  I'd also add a "A person with 0 posts may not start a new thread" rule.

2,562

(4 replies, posted in Guitars and accessories)

I change them when they're dirty, and lose that nice "new car" smell.

2,563

(15 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

He spent the night in the poke on a couple of occasions.  He also started a forest fire once, and got sued by the federal government over it.

But no prison.

2,564

(24 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

SouthPaw41L wrote:
jerome.oneil wrote:

Shawn Lane.


Died in 2003.  <img src="images/smiley_icons/icon_sad.gif" border=0 alt="Sad">

Oh my gawd, this guy is(was)  freakin' insane. I'm so amazed by his precision, variety, and speed.  A technical genius if there ever was one!What a loss. R.I.P. big man.......

Yaaaay!  Another Laneiac!

Are you a member of the Memphis Monster?

http://donniebshawn.com/v-web/bulletin/bb/index.php

His family checks in there on occasion (Mom, Sister, and Daughter), and everyone that posts there is full blown freaking awesome.

2,565

(15 replies, posted in Bands and artists)

Johnny Cash was a hard living guy, but he never spent any time in prison.  That's a myth.

2,566

(13 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Quit blaming your fingers, and practice.  Get your wrist waaay out in front of the neck.

2,567

(14 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

You're stealing, no matter how super secret you keep it.

2,568

(15 replies, posted in Acoustic)

Here's that video of Shawn Lane in India playing a Backpacker.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyn2Qs5sYlw

2,569

(14 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

mhebert wrote:
jerome.oneil wrote:
upyerkilt wrote:

I still buy cd's of bands I like. and the ones I am not sure of, or old ones I have already bought, or ones I want to experiment with I down load for free, could call it illegal I guess,

You could call it illegal because it is.


and on this subject...the arctic monkeys first gave their music for free on the internet, before getting signed. After they got signed the record comany brought out an album of songs they had already let people dowload for free. And guess who bought their album? yep!! the majority of people that dowloaded the free stuff.

The copyright holder has exclusive rights on their music.  If they want to give it away on the internet, great.  If they want to put it on a disk and charge for it, that's great too.  The point being, they have that right.  You not respecting their rights is wrong.

Hey Jerome, are you a sagitarius?

No.  I'm an engineer and I make my living because of intellectual property rights protections.

2,570

(14 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

upyerkilt wrote:

not at all jerome,
bands being greedy is wrong. most have enough money but want more. they dont need it.
Music should be shared and should be entertaining, not a way to screw money out of people as juch as they can.

Bands making money off of the product they produce is eminently right.    Whether you think they have enough, or they need it, is entirely inconsequential.

If you think music should be shared, feel free to write all the music you like and share it.  That in no way give you right or cause to take their work for your own ends without meeting their requirements  as the author or copyright holder of the work.   If they want you to pay $12 for a CD, or $.99 for a song off of iTunes, then that is what you should do.

2,571

(40 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

Old Doll,

I firmly believe that there are really only two churches on Earth.  There is the Church of God, which is made of those who seek God, and the Church of Power, which is made of those who seek power and control.  There is nothing else.

Zurf,

Thank you for a thoughtful response, but it doesn't answer the question.  "Who's criteria?"  You say it isn't up to you to judge, but that is exactly what you've done, answering the question in a not so direct manner.  It's Zurf's criteria.  To be a Christian, one must simply profess their faith in Christ.  The Mormons do that, and are by every definition a Christian organization.   

The Bible is just a book, written by men for their own ends.   It has no more or less claim on the truth than the Book for Mormon, or the Perl of Great Price, or the Doctrine and Covenants, or the Bhagavad Ghita, or the Quran,  for that matter.   Scripture does not define truth.  It is just a reflection of the truth in the world.   The true word of the Creator is written directly into the creation.

2,572

(10 replies, posted in Electric)

So don't play the open chords.  Play them barred.

Just because chordie shows you the open G or C or D or E doesn't mean you have to play them that way.  Every chord has many different voicings on the fretboard.  It's worthwhile to learn them.

2,573

(40 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

James McCormick wrote:

Unfortunately, there are plenty of zealous fundamentalist radicals here in the US that are very serious about 'taking back America' (whatever that means).  There are overtly political organizations that are tax-exempt simply because they claim to be churches.  Personally, I think that the tax-exempt status of all religious groups should be eliminated and their properties and revenues should be taxed like any other business entity.

I agree with the sentiment, but I don't think eliminating that tax break would produce the end you want.  What that would do is legitimize the political church.  Now, those political groups masquerading as churches at least have to show some pretense at being a religious organization.  Take away that tax break, and they are now tax paying organizations with a right to lobby, just like everyone else.  It's an invitation for them to legitimize their political operations.

What we need is much stricter tax exemption enforcement of the existing law.

2,574

(40 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

There is a great Joe Hill classic called the preacher and the slave you should check out.  Utah Phillips keeps that music alive, and I thank God he does.  big_smile

http://www.bloomington.in.us/~mitch/iww/preacher.html

You will eat bye and bye
in that glorious land in the sky!
Work and pray, live on hay!
You'll get pie in the sky when you die!

2,575

(14 replies, posted in Chordie's Chat Corner)

upyerkilt wrote:

I still buy cd's of bands I like. and the ones I am not sure of, or old ones I have already bought, or ones I want to experiment with I down load for free, could call it illegal I guess,

You could call it illegal because it is.


and on this subject...the arctic monkeys first gave their music for free on the internet, before getting signed. After they got signed the record comany brought out an album of songs they had already let people dowload for free. And guess who bought their album? yep!! the majority of people that dowloaded the free stuff.

The copyright holder has exclusive rights on their music.  If they want to give it away on the internet, great.  If they want to put it on a disk and charge for it, that's great too.  The point being, they have that right.  You not respecting their rights is wrong.